Literature DB >> 17351270

Radiation-induced DNA damage responses.

Penny Jeggo1, Markus Löbrich.   

Abstract

The amazing feature of ionising radiation (IR) as a DNA damaging agent is the range of lesions it induces. Such lesions include base damage, single strand breaks (SSBs), double strand breaks (DSBs) of varying complexity and DNA cross links. A range of DNA damage response mechanisms operate to help maintain genomic stability in the face of such damage. Such mechanisms include pathways of DNA repair and signal transduction mechanisms. Increasing evidence suggests that these pathways operate co-operatively. In addition, the relative impact of one mechanism over another most probably depends upon the cell cycle phase and tissue type. Here, the distinct damage response pathways are reviewed and the current understanding of the interplay between them is considered. Since DNA DSBs are the major lethal lesion induced by IR, the focus lies in the mechanisms responding to direct or indirectly induced DSBs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17351270     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncl495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  45 in total

Review 1.  DNA damage-induced cell death: lessons from the central nervous system.

Authors:  Helena Lobo Borges; Rafael Linden; Jean Y J Wang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

2.  Screening a genome-wide S. pombe deletion library identifies novel genes and pathways involved in genome stability maintenance.

Authors:  Gaurang P Deshpande; Jacqueline Hayles; Kwang-Lae Hoe; Dong-Uk Kim; Han-Oh Park; Edgar Hartsuiker
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-03-04

3.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Chichuan Yang; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Chk2-dependent phosphorylation of XRCC1 in the DNA damage response promotes base excision repair.

Authors:  Wen-Cheng Chou; Hui-Chun Wang; Fen-Hwa Wong; Shian-ling Ding; Pei-Ei Wu; Sheau-Yann Shieh; Chen-Yang Shen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Analysis of DNA breaks, DNA damage response, and apoptosis produced by high NaCl.

Authors:  Natalia I Dmitrieva; Maurice B Burg
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2008-10-01

Review 6.  MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings.

Authors:  Mitch McVey; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Sister chromatid exchanges occur in G2-irradiated cells.

Authors:  Sandro Conrad; Julia Künzel; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Standard fluorescent imaging of live cells is highly genotoxic.

Authors:  Jing Ge; David K Wood; David M Weingeist; Somsak Prasongtanakij; Panida Navasumrit; Mathuros Ruchirawat; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 4.355

9.  Human embryonic stem cells have enhanced repair of multiple forms of DNA damage.

Authors:  Scott Maynard; Anna Maria Swistowska; Jae Wan Lee; Ying Liu; Su-Ting Liu; Alexandre Bettencourt Da Cruz; Mahendra Rao; Nadja C de Souza-Pinto; Xianmin Zeng; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 10.  Improving gemcitabine-mediated radiosensitization using molecularly targeted therapy: a review.

Authors:  Meredith A Morgan; Leslie A Parsels; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.