Literature DB >> 17351137

Rats depend on habit memory for discrimination learning and retention.

Nicola J Broadbent1, Larry R Squire, Robert E Clark.   

Abstract

We explored the circumstances in which rats engage either declarative memory (and the hippocampus) or habit memory (and the dorsal striatum). Rats with damage to the hippocampus or dorsal striatum were given three different two-choice discrimination tasks (odor, object, and pattern). These tasks differed in the number of trials required for learning (approximately 10, 60, and 220 trials). Dorsal striatum lesions impaired discrimination performance to a greater extent than hippocampal lesions. Strikingly, performance on the task learned most rapidly (the odor discrimination) was severely impaired by dorsal striatum lesions and entirely spared by hippocampal lesions. These findings suggest that discrimination learning in the rat is primarily supported by the dorsal striatum (and habit memory) and that rats engage a habit-based memory system even for a task that takes only a few trials to acquire. Considered together with related studies of humans and nonhuman primates, the findings suggest that different species will approach the same task in different ways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17351137      PMCID: PMC1838555          DOI: 10.1101/lm.455607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  34 in total

1.  One-trial odor-reward association: a form of event memory not dependent on hippocampal function.

Authors:  Emma R Wood; Kara M Agster; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Dorsal striatum and stimulus-response learning: lesions of the dorsolateral, but not dorsomedial, striatum impair acquisition of a stimulus-response-based instrumental discrimination task, while sparing conditioned place preference learning.

Authors:  R E Featherstone; R J McDonald
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Behavioral and neuroanatomical differentiation of response-suppression and response-shift mechanisms in the rat.

Authors:  D S Olton
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1972-03

4.  Behavioral effects of selective ablation of the caudate nucleus.

Authors:  I Divac; H E Rosvold; M K Szwarcbart
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-04

5.  Effects of interference on discrimination learning and recall by rats with hippocampal lesions.

Authors:  G Winocur
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1979-02

6.  Concurrent discrimination learning of monkeys after hippocampal, entorhinal, or fornix lesions.

Authors:  M Moss; H Mahut; S Zola-Morgan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies.

Authors:  Russell A Poldrack; Mark G Packard
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Preserved anterograde and retrograde memory of rapidly acquired olfactory discrminations after neurotoxic hippocampal lesions.

Authors:  Zachariah Jonasson; John K Ballantyne; Mark G Baxter
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 9.  Learning and memory functions of the Basal Ganglia.

Authors:  Mark G Packard; Barbara J Knowlton
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Dorsal striatum and stimulus-response learning: lesions of the dorsolateral, but not dorsomedial, striatum impair acquisition of a simple discrimination task.

Authors:  R E Featherstone; R J McDonald
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  25 in total

1.  Retrograde amnesia for visual memories after hippocampal damage in rats.

Authors:  Jonathan Epp; Julian R Keith; Simon C Spanswick; Jared C Stone; Glen T Prusky; Robert J Sutherland
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 2.  Hippocampus and retrograde amnesia in the rat model: a modest proposal for the situation of systems consolidation.

Authors:  Robert J Sutherland; Fraser T Sparks; Hugo Lehmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Differential effect of treadmill exercise on histone deacetylase activity in rat striatum at different stages of development.

Authors:  Viviane Rostirola Elsner; Carla Basso; Karine Bertoldi; Louisiana Carolina Ferreira de Meireles; Laura Reck Cechinel; Ionara Rodrigues Siqueira
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  Three Scientific Controversies to Engage Students in Reading Primary Literature.

Authors:  D J Brasier
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2017-11-15

5.  The pharmacological sensitivity of a touchscreen-based visual discrimination task in the rat using simple and perceptually challenging stimuli.

Authors:  J C Talpos; A C Fletcher; C Circelli; M D Tricklebank; S L Dix
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Object recognition memory and the rodent hippocampus.

Authors:  Nicola J Broadbent; Stephane Gaskin; Larry R Squire; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Novel odour recognition memory is independent of the hippocampus in rats.

Authors:  Gavin A Scott; Mbongeni Mtetwa; Hugo Lehmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The involvement of Type II Neuregulin-1 in rat visuospatial learning and memory.

Authors:  Adam R Taylor; Sara B Taylor; James I Koenig
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  A comparison of discrimination and reversal learning for olfactory and visual stimuli in aged rats.

Authors:  Andrea M Brushfield; Trinh T Luu; Bryan D Callahan; Paul E Gilbert
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Caudate nucleus is critically involved in trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Luke C Flores; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.