Literature DB >> 15058796

Confidant and breast cancer patient reports of quality of life.

Ann K Sandgren1, Amy B Mullens, Shannon C Erickson, Kathleen M Romanek, Kevin D McCaul.   

Abstract

It is well known that breast cancer patients report a temporary decline in their quality of life following diagnosis. Caregivers observe these changes, but only a few studies have examined the shared perceptions of patients and others concerning the patient's QOL. In this study, 112 women (96% white, 4% Native American), ages 34-84, rated their QOL 1-3 months after diagnosis on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT). The patients identified their main source of emotional support, and this confidant also completed the FACT. Most participants selected a spouse (60%); others selected a child (11%), friend (11%), or sibling (7%). Comparisons on five QOL subscales showed good agreement between patients and their confidants, with an average patient-confidant correlation across subscales of r = 0.34. At baseline, patients reported a higher overall QOL (M = 90.30) than their confidants (87.32), p = 0.05. At a 4-month follow up, significant patient/confidant difference was only obtained for the emotional well being subscale. Overall, the data attest to the reliability of the FACT, but they also suggest that confidants may overestimate how distressed patients feel, or that patients are reluctant to admit to distress. Such discrepancies could cause misguided social support efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15058796     DOI: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000015287.90952.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  18 in total

1.  A comparison of patient and proxy symptom assessments in advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  C L Nekolaichuk; E Bruera; K Spachynski; T MacEachern; J Hanson; T O Maguire
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.762

2.  The use of significant others as proxy raters of the quality of life of patients with brain cancer.

Authors:  K C Sneeuw; N K Aaronson; D Osoba; M J Muller; M A Hsu; W K Yung; M Brada; E S Newlands
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Criterion-based validation of the EORTC QLQ-C36 in advanced melanoma: the CIPS questionnaire and proxy raters.

Authors:  V Sigurdardóttir; Y Brandberg; M Sullivan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Psychological adjustment in breast cancer: processes of emotional distress.

Authors:  J E Epping-Jordan; B E Compas; D M Osowiecki; G Oppedisano; C Gerhardt; K Primo; D N Krag
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument.

Authors:  M J Brady; D F Cella; F Mo; A E Bonomi; D S Tulsky; S R Lloyd; S Deasy; M Cobleigh; G Shiomoto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Quality of life in long-term, disease-free survivors of breast cancer: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz; Katherine A Desmond; Beth Leedham; Julia H Rowland; Beth E Meyerowitz; Thomas R Belin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-01-02       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Observer variation in assessment of quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  J M Blazeby; M H Williams; D Alderson; J R Farndon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Frequency and correlates of posttraumatic-stress-disorder-like symptoms after treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  M J Cordova; M A Andrykowski; D E Kenady; P C McGrath; D A Sloan; W H Redd
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1995-12

9.  Patients with cancer and their spouse caregivers. Perceptions of the illness experience.

Authors:  E C Clipp; L K George
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Quality of life assessment in patients undergoing head and neck surgery as evaluated by lay caregivers.

Authors:  D G Deschler; K A Walsh; S Friedman; R E Hayden
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaires: a systematic review.

Authors:  Indiara Soares Oliveira; Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa; Felipe Ribeiro Cabral Fagundes; Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Value of a confidant relationship in psychosocial care of people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jane Grose; Jennifer Freeman; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2012

Review 3.  Systematic review of caregiver responses for patient health-related quality of life in adult cancer care.

Authors:  Jessica K Roydhouse; Ira B Wilson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Psychological distress in different social network members of breast and prostate cancer survivors.

Authors:  Chris Segrin; Terry A Badger
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Comparison of Arab breast cancer survivors and healthy controls for spousal relationship, body image, and emotional distress.

Authors:  Miri Cohen; Ahlam Abdallah Mabjish; Jamal Zidan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Psychosocial Distress in Women With Breast Cancer and Their Partners and Its Impact on Supportive Care Needs in Partners.

Authors:  Ute Goerling; Corinna Bergelt; Volkmar Müller; Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-09-23

7.  God Attachment: Resource or Complication in Women's and Their Partners' Adjustment to the Threat of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Terry Lynn Gall; Cynthia Bilodeau
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-07-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.