Literature DB >> 17349705

Husbandry practices, badger sett density and habitat composition as risk factors for transient and persistent bovine tuberculosis on UK cattle farms.

L A Reilly1, O Courtenay.   

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a persistent problem in cattle herds in Great Britain and Ireland. Farm management and cattle husbandry practices can influence the risk of transmission of bTB and hence the likelihood of bTB breakdown (>or=1 reactor to the tuberculin skin test). Biological differences are expected in the transmission dynamics, and hence risk factors for bTB breakdown, on farms where infection persists in the herd compared to farms where infection is more sporadic or short-lived. Comparative case-control studies were performed to test farm management practices as potential risk factors for transient (under breakdown restrictions for <or=6 months) and persistent (under breakdown restrictions for >6 months) bTB breakdown over 5 years (1995-1999) on 179 and 171 UK cattle farms, respectively. Farms were characterised for badger sett density and farm habitat composition by ground survey, farmers were questioned retrospectively on management practices, and cases and controls were identified from national tuberculin test records. Controlling for routine tuberculin testing interval, log-transformed herd size, regional location, badger sett density and farm habitat complexity, multivariable logistic regression identified increased odds of both transient and persistent breakdown on farms that bought-in cows (odds ratio (OR)>or=4.9; 95% confidence interval (CI)>or=1.1;22.8). In addition, the purchase of >50 head of cattle (OR=4.0, 95% CI=1.0;16.0) and the storage of manure for >or/=6 months (OR=4.4; 95% CI=1.3;15.4) were risk factors for transient breakdown, whereas the use of silage clamps (OR=9.1; 95% CI=2.0;40.8) increased the risk of persistent breakdown. Decreased odds of both transient and persistent breakdown were associated with higher stocking densities (>3cattle/ha) (OR<or=0.2; 95% CI<or=0.1;0.9), and running mixed herd enterprises compared to only beef or dairy (OR=0.1; 95% CI=0.0;0.7) was an additional protective factor against persistent breakdown. In these analyses, the covariates log herd size and tuberculin testing interval were significant predictors of both transient and persistent breakdown, whereas active badger sett density and regional location only affected the risk of persistent breakdown. The collective results suggest that the probability of transient breakdown is most strongly influenced by the purchase of cattle over other management variables and covariates, whereas the probability of persistent breakdown appears to be mostly affected by management factors relating to type of herd enterprise and silage storage in addition to the relative density of badgers. Implications for bTB management are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17349705     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  25 in total

1.  On-farm mitigation of transmission of tuberculosis from white-tailed deer to cattle: literature review and recommendations.

Authors:  W David Walter; Charles W Anderson; Rick Smith; Mike Vanderklok; James J Averill; Kurt C Vercauteren
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2012-09-06

2.  The effect of badger culling on breakdown prolongation and recurrence of bovine tuberculosis in cattle herds in Great Britain.

Authors:  Katerina Karolemeas; Christl A Donnelly; Andrew J K Conlan; Andrew P Mitchell; Richard S Clifton-Hadley; Paul Upton; James L N Wood; Trevelyan J McKinley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Local cattle and badger populations affect the risk of confirmed tuberculosis in British cattle herds.

Authors:  Flavie Vial; W Thomas Johnston; Christl A Donnelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pathogen quantitation in complex matrices: a multi-operator comparison of DNA extraction methods with a novel assessment of PCR inhibition.

Authors:  Alessandra Pontiroli; Emma Rachel Travis; Francis Patrick Sweeney; David Porter; William Hugo Gaze; Sam Mason; Victoria Hibberd; Jennifer Holden; Orin Courtenay; Elizabeth Margaret Helen Wellington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Classification of worldwide bovine tuberculosis risk factors in cattle: a stratified approach.

Authors:  Marie-France Humblet; Maria Laura Boschiroli; Claude Saegerman
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.683

6.  Impact of imperfect test sensitivity on determining risk factors: the case of bovine tuberculosis.

Authors:  Camille Szmaragd; Laura E Green; Graham F Medley; William J Browne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  A review of risk factors for bovine tuberculosis infection in cattle in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  J M Broughan; J Judge; E Ely; R J Delahay; G Wilson; R S Clifton-Hadley; A V Goodchild; H Bishop; J E Parry; S H Downs
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.434

8.  Herd-level risk factors for bovine tuberculosis: a literature review.

Authors:  Robin A Skuce; Adrian R Allen; Stanley W J McDowell
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2012-06-28

9.  Bovine tuberculosis in Northern Ireland: quantification of the population disease-level effect from cattle leaving herds detected as a source of infection.

Authors:  L P Doyle; E A Courcier; A W Gordon; M J H O'Hagan; J A Stegeman; F D Menzies
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.434

10.  Spatial-temporal Variations of Bovine Tuberculosis Incidence in France between 1965 and 2000.

Authors:  M E A Bekara; L Azizi; J-J Bénet; B Durand
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.005

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.