Literature DB >> 17349534

Malignancy associated with the use of intestinal segments in the urinary tract.

Amanda C North1, Yegappan Lakshmanan.   

Abstract

Use of intestinal segments for urinary tract reconstruction has become widespread. In these patients, urologists are increasingly encountering malignancies that may be a direct result of this altered milieu. This review attempts to summarize the current literature on cancer in patients with intestinal segments in their urinary tracts. Although the exact etiology for this increased risk of malignancy is still unclear, several theories have been proposed. Many investigators now recommend annual screening in patients who have intestinal segments in contact with urine beginning 10 years after the initial surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17349534     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2006.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current approaches to the urologic care of children with spina bifida.

Authors:  David B Joseph
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  [Secondary malignancies in urinary diversions].

Authors:  T Kälble; I Hofmann; J W Thüroff; R Stein; R Hautmann; H Riedmiller; D Vergho; L Hertle; C Wülfing; M Truß; S Roth; F C von Rundstedt; P Albers; J Gschwend; K Herkommer; U Humke; M Spahn; P Bader; J Steffens; R Harzmann; C G Stief; A Karl; S C Müller; M Waldner; J Noldus; K Kleinschmidt; P Alken; B Kopper; M Fisch; A Lampel; A Stenzel; J Fichtner; B Flath; H Rübben; K P Juenemann; S Hautmann; A Knipper; D Leusmann; W Strohmaier; W F Thon; S Miller; K Weingärtner; A Schilling; H Piechota; J E Becht; H Schwaibold; P Bub; S Conrad; U Wenderoth; W Merkle; W Rösch; T Otto; B Ulshöfer; M Westenfelder
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Spina bifida.

Authors:  Alvaro A Saavedra; Dawn Maclellan; Gary J Gray
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  [Tumors following urinary diversions. Results of a multicenter study].

Authors:  T Kälble; I Hofmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  De Novo Secondary Adenocarcinoma in the Colon Used as Urinary Diversion Not in Contact with the Fecal Stream: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonio V Sterpetti; Umberto Costi; Raffaele Grande; Giuseppe D'Ermo; Paolo Sapienza
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Adolescent urology: developing lifelong care for congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Dan Wood
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Tumor growth in intestinal neobladder.

Authors:  Wojciech Jerzy Skrodzki; Jarosław Głuchowski; James Weli-Wegbe; Adam Blawat; Janusz Kordasz
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-01-27

8.  Transition to adulthood with a bladder augmentation: histopathologic concerns.

Authors:  Emil Mammadov; Sergulen Dervisoglu; Mehmet Elicevik; Haluk Emir; Yunus Soylet; S N Cenk Buyukunal
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  Pediatric bladder augmentation - Panacea or Pandora's box?

Authors:  James P J Ross; Melise Keays; Christopher Neville; Michael Leonard; Luis Guerra
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Augmentation cystoplasty: Contemporary indications, techniques and complications.

Authors:  Rajan Veeratterapillay; Andrew C Thorpe; Chris Harding
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.