Literature DB >> 17347283

New strategies in haemodiafiltration (HDF): prospective comparative analysis between on-line mixed HDF and mid-dilution HDF.

Annalisa Feliciani1, Maria Alessandra Riva, Simona Zerbi, Pio Ruggiero, Anna Rita Plati, Giorgio Cozzi, Luciano A Pedrini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improvement in the uraemic toxicity profile obtained with the application of convective and mixed dialysis techniques has stimulated the development of more efficient strategies. Our study was a prospective randomized evaluation of the clinical and technical characteristics of two new haemodiafiltration (HDF) strategies, mixed HDF and mid-dilution HDF, which have recently been proposed with the aim of increasing efficiency and safety with respect to the standard traditional HDF infusion modes.
METHODS: Ten stable patients on renal replacement therapy (mean age 64.7 +/- 8.2 years) were submitted in randomized sequence to one mid-week session of mid-dilution HDF and one of mixed HDF with trans-membrane pressure feedback control. All sessions were carried out under similar operating conditions and involved monitoring pressure within the internal dialyser compartments and calculating the rheological and hydraulic indexes. Efficiency in removing urea, phosphate and beta2-microglobulin (beta2-m) was tested.
RESULTS: In mixed HDF, safer and more effective flux/pressure conditions resulted in better preservation of the hydraulic and solute membrane permeability (mean in vivo ultrafiltration coefficient 36.9 +/- 3.9 vs 20.1 +/- 3.3 ml/h/mmHg) and ensured higher volume exchange (38.7 +/- 4.2 vs 35.3 +/- 6.5 l/session, P = 0.02) and greater efficiency in removing small and middle molecules (mean urea clearance: 274 +/- 42 vs 264 +/- 47 ml/min, P = 0.028; eKt/V: 1.78 +/- 0.22 vs 1.71 +/- 0.26, P = 0.036; mean phosphate clearance: 138 +/- 16 vs 116 +/- 45 ml/min, P = 0.2; mean beta2-m clearance: 81 +/- 13 vs 59 +/- 13 ml/min, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Mixed HDF was the most efficient technique in the highest range of safe operating conditions. In mid-dilution HDF, high pressures generated inside the dialyser compromised membrane permeability and limited the total infusion rate, resulting in an overall reduction in solute removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17347283     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfm023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  3 in total

Review 1.  Choices in hemodialysis therapies: variants, personalized therapy and application of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Bernard Canaud; Stefano Stuard; Frank Laukhuf; Grace Yan; Maria Ines Gomez Canabal; Paik Seong Lim; Michael A Kraus
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-12-27

Review 2.  Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Yasushi Tsujimoto; Sho Miki; Hiroki Shimada; Hiraku Tsujimoto; Hideto Yasuda; Yuki Kataoka; Tomoko Fujii
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-14

3.  Comparison of the effects of predilution and postdilution hemodiafiltration on neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets.

Authors:  Kenji Sakurai; Takeshi Saito; Fumi Yamauchi; Daiki Asahi; Hiromi Hosoya
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 1.731

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.