Literature DB >> 17347136

Role of epigenetic effectors in maintenance of the long-term persistent bystander effect in spleen in vivo.

Igor Koturbash1, Alex Boyko, Rocio Rodriguez-Juarez, Robert J McDonald, Volodymyr P Tryndyak, Igor Kovalchuk, Igor P Pogribny, Olga Kovalchuk.   

Abstract

Radiation therapy is a primary treatment modality for brain tumors, yet it has been linked to the increased incidence of secondary, post-radiation therapy cancers. These cancers are thought to be linked to indirect radiation-induced bystander effect. Bystander effect occurs when irradiated cells communicate damage to nearby, non-irradiated 'bystander' cells, ultimately contributing to genome destabilization in the non-exposed cells. Recent evidence suggests that bystander effect may be epigenetic in nature; however, characterization of epigenetic mechanisms involved in bystander effect generation and its long-term persistence has yet to be defined. To investigate the possibility that localized X-ray irradiation induces persistent bystander effects in distant tissue, we monitored the induction of epigenetic changes (i.e. alterations in DNA methylation, histone methylation and microRNA (miRNA) expression) in the rat spleen tissue 24 h and 7 months after localized cranial exposure to 20 Gy of X-rays. We found that localized cranial radiation exposure led to the induction of bystander effect in lead-shielded, distant spleen tissue. Specifically, this exposure caused the profound epigenetic dysregulation in the bystander spleen tissue that manifested as a significant loss of global DNA methylation, alterations in methylation of long interspersed nucleotide element-1 (LINE-1) retrotransposable elements and down-regulation of DNA methyltransferases and methyl-binding protein methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2). Further, irradiation significantly altered expression of miR-194, a miRNA putatively targeting both DNA methyltransferase-3a and MeCP2. This study is the first to report conclusive evidence of the long-term persistence of bystander effects in radiation carcinogenesis target organ (spleen) upon localized distant exposure using the doses comparable with those used for clinical brain tumor treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17347136     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgm053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  61 in total

1.  Radiation Induced Bystander Effect in vivo.

Authors:  Yunfei Chai; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Acta Med Nagasaki       Date:  2008

2.  microRNAome changes in bystander three-dimensional human tissue models suggest priming of apoptotic pathways.

Authors:  Olga Kovalchuk; Franz J Zemp; Jody N Filkowski; Alvin M Altamirano; Jennifer S Dickey; Gloria Jenkins-Baker; Stephen A Marino; David J Brenner; William M Bonner; Olga A Sedelnikova
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 3.  Double-strand breaks and the concept of short- and long-term epigenetic memory.

Authors:  Christian Orlowski; Li-Jeen Mah; Raja S Vasireddy; Assam El-Osta; Tom C Karagiannis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  H2AX phosphorylation in response to DNA double-strand break formation during bystander signalling: effect of microRNA knockdown.

Authors:  Jennifer S Dickey; Franz J Zemp; Alvin Altamirano; Olga A Sedelnikova; William M Bonner; Olga Kovalchuk
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Exosome-mediated microRNA transfer plays a role in radiation-induced bystander effect.

Authors:  Shuai Xu; Jufang Wang; Nan Ding; Wentao Hu; Xurui Zhang; Bing Wang; Junrui Hua; Wenjun Wei; Qiyun Zhu
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 6.  Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Joe M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 7.  Towards incorporating epigenetic mechanisms into carcinogen identification and evaluation.

Authors:  Zdenko Herceg; Marie-Pierre Lambert; Karin van Veldhoven; Christiana Demetriou; Paolo Vineis; Martyn T Smith; Kurt Straif; Christopher P Wild
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  MiR-663 inhibits radiation-induced bystander effects by targeting TGFB1 in a feedback mode.

Authors:  Wentao Hu; Shuai Xu; Bin Yao; Mei Hong; Xin Wu; Hailong Pei; Lei Chang; Nan Ding; Xiaofei Gao; Caiyong Ye; Jufang Wang; Tom K Hei; Guangming Zhou
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.652

9.  MiR-21 is involved in radiation-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Shuai Xu; Nan Ding; Hailong Pei; Wentao Hu; Wenjun Wei; Xurui Zhang; Guangming Zhou; Jufang Wang
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 10.  Response of transposable elements to environmental stressors.

Authors:  Isabelle R Miousse; Marie-Cecile G Chalbot; Annie Lumen; Alesia Ferguson; Ilias G Kavouras; Igor Koturbash
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 5.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.