Literature DB >> 1734485

MR imaging in high-risk obstetric patients: a valuable complement to US.

T L Angtuaco1, H R Shah, D R Mattison, J G Quirk.   

Abstract

The accuracy of prenatal diagnosis has become increasingly critical in the field of high-risk obstetrics. Although ultrasound (US) provides adequate information in most cases and continues to be the initial prenatal examination of choice, there are instances in which the results of the US study may be equivocal. The role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was explored in 27 selected patients with various indications to determine its effectiveness as a complement to US. MR imaging was most helpful in the diagnosis of extrauterine gestation, evaluation of placental position, determination of extent or nature of masses associated with pregnancy, and differentiation between diaphragmatic hernia and a thoracic mass. Although MR imaging did not add information that affected the accuracy of the diagnosis of oligohydramnios, in all other cases it provided an extra dimension in diagnosis by showing clearer anatomic relationships in the pelvis. It has proved to be a valuable complement to an equivocal US study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1734485     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.12.1.1734485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  6 in total

Review 1.  Mapping fetal brain development in utero using magnetic resonance imaging: the Big Bang of brain mapping.

Authors:  Colin Studholme
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Comparison of prenatal and postnatal MRI findings in the evaluation of intrauterine CNS anomalies requiring postnatal neurosurgical treatment.

Authors:  A Papadias; C Miller; W L Martin; M D Kilby; S Sgouros
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography in fetal pathology.

Authors:  A Perrone; S Savelli; C Maggi; L Di Pietro; M Di Maurizio; J Tesei; L Ballesio; C De Felice; A Giancotti; R Di Iorio; L Manganaro
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Methods for Monitoring Risk of Hypoxic Damage in Fetal and Neonatal Brains: A Review.

Authors:  Liaisan Uzianbaeva; Yan Yan; Tanaya Joshi; Nina Yin; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Mohammad Mehrmohammadi
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.587

5.  The usefulness of fetal MRI for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Yong-Seok Sohn; Myung-Joon Kim; Ja-Young Kwon; Young-Han Kim; Yong-Won Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pregnancy with Intrauterine Growth Restriction: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Serafina Perrone; Antonino Santacroce; Giuseppe de Bernardo; Maria Gabriella Alagna; Salvatore Francesco Carbone; Irene Paternò; Giuseppe Buonocore
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 3.434

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.