Literature DB >> 17343946

Re-examining structural constraints on the initiation of bimanual movements: the role of starting locations, movement amplitudes, and target locations.

Matthias Weigelt1.   

Abstract

Structural constraints affect the coordination of bimanual movements in ways that have been taken to suggest that the specification of different movement amplitudes is subject to strong intermanual interference effects. Most experiments taken to support this notion, however, confounded variations of movement amplitudes with symmetry in starting locations and variations in target location. The present experiment was designed to further investigate the relative influence of the parameters starting location, movement amplitude, and target location on bimanual movement coordination. Participants performed simultaneous reaching movements with the left and right hand from same and different starting locations to same and different target locations. On each trial, two movements could match on none, one, or all of the parameters. We assessed the influence of each parameter by comparing conditions in which only a single parameter matched between the two hands with conditions in which all parameters differed. The reaction-time data revealed some challenging results for previous studies: (1) same starting locations significantly delayed movement initiation; (2) specifying movement amplitudes had virtually no effect on movement initiation, whereas (3) selecting same target locations significantly benefited the bimanual responses. These findings cannot be taken to support the notion that amplitude specification affects the initiation of bimanual movements. Rather, they support the notion that the initial starting locations of the two hands and the selection of target locations decide about the ease with which we perform bimanual reaching movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17343946     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  8 in total

1.  Goal congruency without stimulus congruency in bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Henrike Krauss; Matthias Weigelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-03-05

2.  Effects of stimulus cueing on bimanual grasp posture planning.

Authors:  Charmayne M L Hughes; Christian Seegelke; Paola Reissig; Christoph Schütz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Comparing movement preparation of unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric movements.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Brendan D Cameron; Erin K Cressman; Ian M Franks; Mark G Carpenter; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Facilitation and interference during the preparation of bimanual movements: contributions from starting locations, movement amplitudes, and target locations.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Brendan D Cameron; Ian M Franks; Mark G Carpenter; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-12

Review 5.  Cognition, action, and object manipulation.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Kate M Chapman; Matthias Weigelt; Daniel J Weiss; Robrecht van der Wel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Movement order and saccade direction affect a common measure of eye-hand coordination in bimanual reaching.

Authors:  Eric Mooshagian; Cunguo Wang; Afreen Ferdoash; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.

Authors:  Charmayne M L Hughes; Jeffrey M Haddad; Elizabeth A Franz; Howard N Zelaznik; Joong Hyun Ryu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Co-actors represent the order of each other's actions.

Authors:  Laura Schmitz; Cordula Vesper; Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-08-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.