Literature DB >> 17342562

The clinical significance of bile duct sludge: is it different from bile duct stones?

D Keizman1, M Ish-Shalom, F M Konikoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some patients with suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones are found to have sludge and no stones. Although sludge in the gallbladder is a precursor of gallbladder stones, the significance of bile duct sludge (BDS) is poorly defined. This study aimed to compare BDS with bile duct stones in terms of frequency, associated risk factors, and clinical outcome after endoscopic therapy.
METHODS: The study enrolled 228 patients who underwent therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for suspected choledocholithiasis. The patients were divided into two groups: patients with BDS but no stones on ERCP and patients with CBD stones. The presence of risk factors for bile duct stones (age, periampullary diverticulum, ductal dilation or angulation, previous open cholecystectomy) were assessed at ERCP. Follow-up data (36 +/- 19 months) were obtained from medical records and by patient questioning.
RESULTS: Bile duct sludge occurred in 14% (31/228) of patients and was more common in females. After endoscopic clearance, CBD stones recurred in 17% (33/197) of the patients with CBD stones, and in 16% (5/31) of the patients with BDS (p = 0.99). Common bile duct dilation was less common in the sludge group. The other known risk factors for recurrent CBD stones (age, previous open cholecystectomy, bile duct angulation, and the presence of a peripampullary diverticulum) were not statistically different between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that the clinical significance of symptomatic BDS is similar to that of CBD stones. Bile duct sludge seems to be an early stage of choledocholithiasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17342562     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9153-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  28 in total

Review 1.  Biliary sludge.

Authors:  C W Ko; J H Sekijima; S P Lee
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Risk factors predictive of late complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: long-term (more than 10 years) follow-up study.

Authors:  Masanori Sugiyama; Yutaka Atomi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Biliary sludge: a critical update.

Authors:  M Angelico; A De Santis; L Capocaccia
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 4.  Pathogenesis and treatment of gallstones.

Authors:  D E Johnston; M M Kaplan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-02-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Incidence and significance of primary stones of the common bile duct in choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  N J Lygidakis
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1983-11

Review 6.  Pathogenesis of biliary sludge.

Authors:  S P Lee
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60 years of age.

Authors:  J J Bergman; S van der Mey; E A Rauws; J G Tijssen; D J Gouma; G N Tytgat; K Huibregtse
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Long-term results (7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms.

Authors:  J C Pereira-Lima; R Jakobs; U H Winter; C Benz; W R Martin; H E Adamek; J F Riemann
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Origin and fate of biliary sludge.

Authors:  S P Lee; K Maher; J F Nicholls
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Biliary sludge as a cause of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  S P Lee; J F Nicholls; H Z Park
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-02-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Accuracy of SAGES, ASGE, and ESGE criteria in predicting choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Kinzang Wangchuk; Pongsakorn Srichan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Comparison of the clinical characteristics and imaging findings of acute cholangitis with and without biliary dilatation.

Authors:  M J Hong; S W Kim; H C Kim; D M Yang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Laparoscopic Ultrasonography Versus Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Laparoscopic Surgery for Symptomatic Cholelithiasis and Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones.

Authors:  Ying Luo; Tao Yang; Qiang Yu; Yu Zhang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Do endosonographers agree on the presence of bile duct sludge and the subsequent need for intervention?

Authors:  Rutger Quispel; Hannah M Schutz; Nora D Hallensleben; Abha Bhalla; Robin Timmer; Jeanin E van Hooft; Niels G Venneman; Nicole S Erler; Bart J Veldt; Lydi M J W van Driel; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27

5.  Biliary spontaneous dislodgement spiral stent for patients who underwent mechanical lithotripsy.

Authors:  Lian-Song Ye; Xiang-Lei Yuan; Chun-Cheng Wu; Wei Liu; Jiang Du; Ming-Hong Yao; Qing-Hua Tan; Bing Hu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.