Literature DB >> 17342432

Monitoring of coastal and transitional waters under the E.U. Water Framework Directive.

J G Ferreira1, C Vale, C V Soares, F Salas, P E Stacey, S B Bricker, M C Silva, J C Marques.   

Abstract

A set of guidelines are presented for the definition of monitoring plans in coastal and transitional (estuarine and lagoonal) systems subject to the European Union Water Framework Directive - WFD (2000/60/EC). General principles of best practice in monitoring are outlined, including (a) the definition of three types of broad management objectives: water quality, conservation, and human use, to which the general public may easily relate. These will define the core and research indicators (WFD quality elements) to be used for monitoring; (b) priorities and optimisation in a (financially and logistically) resource-constrained environment; (c) quality assurance; and (d) assessment of monitoring success: this should focus on the outputs, i.e. the internal audit of the monitoring activity, and on the outcomes. The latter component assesses programme effectiveness, i.e. environmental success based on a set of clearly-defined targets, and informs management action. The second part of this work discusses the approach and actions to be carried out for implementing WFD surveillance, operational and investigative monitoring. Appropriate spatial and temporal scales for surveillance monitoring of different indicators are suggested, and operational monitoring is classified into either screening or verification procedures, with an emphasis on the relationship between drivers, pressure, state and response. WFD investigative monitoring is interpreted as applied research, and thus guidelines cannot be prescriptive, except insofar as to provide examples of currently acceptable approaches. Specific case studies are presented for both operational (coastal eutrophication control) and investigative monitoring (harmful algal blooms), in order to illustrate the practical application of these monitoring guidelines. Further information is available at http://www.monae.org/ .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17342432     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9643-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  8 in total

1.  The role of the DPSIR approach and conceptual models in marine environmental management: an example for offshore wind power.

Authors:  Michael Elliott
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  The water framework directive: water alone, or in association with sediment and biota, in determining quality standards?

Authors:  A Borja; V Valencia; J Franco; I Muxika; J Bald; M J Belzunce; O Solaun
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Implementation of the European water framework directive from the Basque country (northern Spain): a methodological approach.

Authors:  Angel Borja; Javier Franco; Victoriano Valencia; Juan Bald; Iñigo Muxika; María Jesús Belzunce; Oihana Solaun
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.553

4.  Bioenergetic responses in green lipped mussels (Perna viridis) as indicators of pollution stress in Xiamen coastal waters, China.

Authors:  Shuhong Wang; Huasheng Hong; Xinhong Wang
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.553

5.  The new Danish stream monitoring programme (NOVANA)--preparing monitoring activities for the Water Framework Directive era.

Authors:  Nikolai Friberg; Annette Baattrup-Pedersen; Morten Lauge Pedersen; Jens Skriver
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Assessing reference conditions and physico-chemical status according to the European Water Framework Directive: a case-study from the Basque Country (Northern Spain).

Authors:  J Bald; A Borja; I Muxika; J Franco; V Valencia
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 5.553

7.  Marine monitoring: Its shortcomings and mismatch with the EU Water Framework Directive's objectives.

Authors:  V N de Jonge; M Elliott; V S Brauer
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 5.553

8.  A "toolbox" for biological and chemical monitoring requirements for the European Union's Water Framework Directive.

Authors:  Ian J Allan; Branislav Vrana; Richard Greenwood; Graham A Mills; Benoit Roig; Catherine Gonzalez
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 6.057

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  A WebGIS platform to monitor environmental conditions in ports and their surroundings in South Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Stavros Kolios; Chrysostomos Stylios; Aleksandr Petunin
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Methodological elements for optimising the spatial monitoring design to support regional benthic ecosystem assessments.

Authors:  Gert Van Hoey; Julia Wischnewski; Johan Craeymeersch; Jennifer Dannheim; Lisette Enserink; Laurent Guerin; Francisco Marco-Rius; Joey O'Connor; Henning Reiss; Anne F Sell; Marie Vanden Berghe; Michael L Zettler; Steven Degraer; Silvana N R Birchenough
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Challenges and difficulties in assessing the environmental status under the requirements of the Ecosystem Approach in North African countries, illustrated by eutrophication assessment.

Authors:  Maialen Garmendia; Ángel Borja; Françoise Breton; Momme Butenschön; Anna Marín; Peter I Miller; François Morisseau; Weidong Xu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Phytoplankton dynamics with a special emphasis on harmful algal blooms in the Mar Piccolo of Taranto (Ionian Sea, Italy).

Authors:  Carmela Caroppo; Federica Cerino; Rocco Auriemma; Tamara Cibic
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  On the Potential of Surfers to Monitor Environmental Indicators in the Coastal Zone.

Authors:  Robert J W Brewin; Lee de Mora; Thomas Jackson; Thomas G Brewin; Jamie Shutler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Optimization of a Coastal Environmental Monitoring Network Based on the Kriging Method: A Case Study of Quanzhou Bay, China.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Minjie Ni; Minggang Cai; Jun Wang; Dongren Huang; Huorong Chen; Xiao Wang; Mengyang Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Determining suspended solids and total phosphorus from turbidity: comparison of high-frequency sampling with conventional monitoring methods.

Authors:  Ana Villa; Jens Fölster; Katarina Kyllmar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Metabarcoding of shrimp stomach content: Harnessing a natural sampler for fish biodiversity monitoring.

Authors:  Andjin Siegenthaler; Owen S Wangensteen; Ana Z Soto; Chiara Benvenuto; Laura Corrigan; Stefano Mariani
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 7.090

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.