Literature DB >> 16426645

Marine monitoring: Its shortcomings and mismatch with the EU Water Framework Directive's objectives.

V N de Jonge1, M Elliott, V S Brauer.   

Abstract

The main goal of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) is to achieve good ecological status across European surface waters by 2015 and as such, it offers the opportunity and thus the challenge to improve the protection of our coastal systems. It is the main example for Europe's increasing desire to conserve aquatic ecosystems. Ironically, since c. 1975 the increasing adoption of EU directives has been accompanied by a decreasing interest of, for example, the Dutch government to assess the quality of its coastal and marine ecosystems. The surveillance and monitoring started in NL in 1971 has declined since the 1980s resulting in a 35% reduction of sampling stations. Given this and interruptions the remaining data series is considered to be insufficient for purposes other than trend analysis and compliance. The Dutch marine managers have apparently chosen a minimal (cost-effective) approach despite the WFD implicitly requiring the incorporation of the system's 'ecological complexity' in indices used to evaluate the ecological status of highly variable systems such as transitional and coastal waters. These indices should include both the community structure and system functioning and to make this really cost-effective a new monitoring strategy is required with a tailor-made programme. Since the adoption of the WFD in 2000 and the launching of the European Marine Strategy in 2002 (and the recently proposed Marine Framework Directive) we suggest reviewing national monitoring programmes in order to integrate water quality monitoring and biological monitoring and change from 'station oriented monitoring' to 'basin or system oriented monitoring' in combination with specific 'cause-effect' studies for highly dynamic coastal systems. Progress will be made if the collected information is integrated and aggregated in valuable tools such as structure- and functioning-oriented computer simulation models and Decision Support Systems. The development of ecological indices integrating community structure and system functioning, such as in Ecological Network Analysis, are proposed to meet a cost-effective approach at the national level and full assessment of the ecosystem status at the EU level. The WFD offers the opportunity to re-consider and re-invest in environmental research and monitoring. Using examples from the Netherlands and, to a lesser extent, the United Kingdom, the present paper therefore reviews marine monitoring and marine environmental research in combination and in the light of such major policy initiatives such as the WFD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16426645     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  8 in total

1.  Monitoring of coastal and transitional waters under the E.U. Water Framework Directive.

Authors:  J G Ferreira; C Vale; C V Soares; F Salas; P E Stacey; S B Bricker; M C Silva; J C Marques
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Methodological elements for optimising the spatial monitoring design to support regional benthic ecosystem assessments.

Authors:  Gert Van Hoey; Julia Wischnewski; Johan Craeymeersch; Jennifer Dannheim; Lisette Enserink; Laurent Guerin; Francisco Marco-Rius; Joey O'Connor; Henning Reiss; Anne F Sell; Marie Vanden Berghe; Michael L Zettler; Steven Degraer; Silvana N R Birchenough
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) monitoring in western Mediterranean: implications for management and conservation.

Authors:  Cecilia Lopez y Royo; Gérard Pergent; Christine Pergent-Martini; Gianna Casazza
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Wave Glider Monitoring of Sediment Transport and Dredge Plumes in a Shallow Marine Sandbank Environment.

Authors:  Vera Van Lancker; Matthias Baeye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Environmental status assessment using DNA metabarcoding: towards a genetics based Marine Biotic Index (gAMBI).

Authors:  Eva Aylagas; Angel Borja; Naiara Rodríguez-Ezpeleta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Optimization of a Coastal Environmental Monitoring Network Based on the Kriging Method: A Case Study of Quanzhou Bay, China.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Minjie Ni; Minggang Cai; Jun Wang; Dongren Huang; Huorong Chen; Xiao Wang; Mengyang Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Multiple stressor effects on marine infauna: responses of estuarine taxa and functional traits to sedimentation, nutrient and metal loading.

Authors:  J I Ellis; D Clark; J Atalah; W Jiang; C Taiapa; M Patterson; J Sinner; J Hewitt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Is it possible to implement a complex adaptive systems approach for marine systems? The experience of Italy and the Adriatic Sea.

Authors:  Emanuele Bigagli
Journal:  Ocean Coast Manag       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.284

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.