RATIONALE: Neuropsychological testing is widespread in adult cocaine abusers, but lacking in teens. Animal models may provide insight into age-related neuropsychological consequences of cocaine exposure. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study is to determine whether developmental plasticity protects or hinders behavioral flexibility after cocaine exposure in adolescent vs. adult rats. METHODS: Using a yoked-triad design, one rat controlled cocaine delivery and the other two passively received cocaine or saline. Rats controlling cocaine delivery (1.0 mg/kg) self-administered for 18 sessions (starting P37 or P77), followed by 18 drug-free days. Rats next were tested in a strategy set shifting task, lasting 11-13 sessions. RESULTS: Cocaine self-administration did not differ between age groups. During initial set formation, adolescent-onset groups required more trials to reach criterion and made more errors than adult-onset groups. During the set shift phase, rats with adult-onset cocaine self-administration experience had higher proportions of correct trials and fewer perseverative + regressive errors than age-matched yoked-controls or rats with adolescent-onset cocaine self-administration experience. During reversal learning, rats with adult-onset cocaine experience (self-administered or passive) required fewer trials to reach criterion, and the self-administering rats made fewer perseverative + regressive errors than yoked-saline rats. Rats receiving adolescent-onset yoked-cocaine had more trial omissions and longer lever press reaction times than age-matched rats self-administering cocaine or receiving yoked-saline. CONCLUSIONS: Prior cocaine self-administration may impair memory to reduce proactive interference during set shifting and reversal learning in adult-onset but not adolescent-onset rats (developmental plasticity protective). Passive cocaine may disrupt aspects of executive function in adolescent-onset but not adult-onset rats (developmental plasticity hinders).
RATIONALE: Neuropsychological testing is widespread in adult cocaine abusers, but lacking in teens. Animal models may provide insight into age-related neuropsychological consequences of cocaine exposure. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study is to determine whether developmental plasticity protects or hinders behavioral flexibility after cocaine exposure in adolescent vs. adult rats. METHODS: Using a yoked-triad design, one rat controlled cocaine delivery and the other two passively received cocaine or saline. Rats controlling cocaine delivery (1.0 mg/kg) self-administered for 18 sessions (starting P37 or P77), followed by 18 drug-free days. Rats next were tested in a strategy set shifting task, lasting 11-13 sessions. RESULTS:Cocaine self-administration did not differ between age groups. During initial set formation, adolescent-onset groups required more trials to reach criterion and made more errors than adult-onset groups. During the set shift phase, rats with adult-onset cocaine self-administration experience had higher proportions of correct trials and fewer perseverative + regressive errors than age-matched yoked-controls or rats with adolescent-onset cocaine self-administration experience. During reversal learning, rats with adult-onset cocaine experience (self-administered or passive) required fewer trials to reach criterion, and the self-administering rats made fewer perseverative + regressive errors than yoked-salinerats. Rats receiving adolescent-onset yoked-cocaine had more trial omissions and longer lever press reaction times than age-matched rats self-administering cocaine or receiving yoked-saline. CONCLUSIONS: Prior cocaine self-administration may impair memory to reduce proactive interference during set shifting and reversal learning in adult-onset but not adolescent-onset rats (developmental plasticity protective). Passive cocaine may disrupt aspects of executive function in adolescent-onset but not adult-onset rats (developmental plasticity hinders).
Authors: B J Casey; Matthew C Davidson; Yuko Hara; Kathleen M Thomas; Antigona Martinez; Adriana Galvan; Jeffrey M Halperin; Claudia E Rodríguez-Aranda; Nim Tottenham Journal: Dev Sci Date: 2004-11
Authors: Danielle Colas-Zelin; Kenneth R Light; Stefan Kolata; Christopher Wass; Alexander Denman-Brice; Christopher Rios; Kris Szalk; Louis D Matzel Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2012-04-15 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Richard M Allen; Kristina A Uban; Elizabeth M Atwood; David S Albeck; Dorothy J Yamamoto Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2007-07-21 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Ellen A A van der Plas; Eveline A Crone; Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Daniel Tranel; Antoine Bechara Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2008-11-26 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Emily R Hankosky; Sara R Westbrook; Rachel M Haake; Jari Willing; Lori T Raetzman; Janice M Juraska; Joshua M Gulley Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 3.332