Literature DB >> 17337141

Pre-emptive analgesia for removal of nasal packing: A double-blind placebo controlled study.

Cuneyt Yilmazer1, Mesut Sener, Ismail Yilmaz, Alper Nabi Erkan, Can Alper Cagici, Asli Donmez, Gulnaz Arslan, Levent Naci Ozluoglu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The most frequent complaint of patients after septoplasty is severe pain felt during removal of nasal packing placed on the operation. Various methods have been described to decrease pain and to increase patient comfort during removal of nasal packing. However, these methods are not practical. There has been an increase in the number of studies on pre-emptive analgesia use for postoperative pain relief. The aim of this study was to determine whether pre-emptive analgesia decreased pain during removal of Merocel packs placed in septoplasties.
METHODS: This is a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study. The study included 121 patients who underwent elective septoplasty in our otorhinolaryngology clinic. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups: study and placebo groups. The study and placebo groups received two tablets of diflunisal 500 mg and placebo, respectively, two and a half hours before removal of nasal packing. Visual analog scale (VAS) values immediately after and 5 min after removal of nasal packing, effects of the procedure on patient comfort and its side-effects were evaluated separately.
RESULTS: VAS values immediately after the removal of nasal packs significantly decreased in the study group (p<0.001), but there was no significant difference in VAS values obtained after the procedure between the study and placebo groups. Patient discomforts were significantly lower in the diflunisal group (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that pre-emptive analgesia decreases pain during removal of nasal packing placed in septoplasties and increases patient comfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17337141     DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2006.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx        ISSN: 0385-8146            Impact factor:   1.863


  4 in total

1.  Nasal septal packing: which one?

Authors:  Engin Acıoğlu; Deniz Tuna Edizer; Özgür Yiğit; Fırat Onur; Zeynep Alkan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Comparison of septoplasty with and without nasal packing and review of literature.

Authors:  Rajashri S Mane; Balasaheb Patil; Anjana Mohite
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-02-08

3.  Effect of lidocaine on pain caused by nasal pack removal after closed reduction of nasal bone fractures.

Authors:  Ji Yoon Sung; Kyung Dong Kang; Min Wook Kim; Joo Hyoung Kim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2020-01-15

4.  Transeptal suturing - a cost-efficient alternative for nasal packing in septal surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Pérez Plasencia; Juan Carlos Falcón; Silvia Borkoski Barreiro; María Sacramento Bocanegra-Pérez; Mario Vicente Barrero; Ángel Ramos Macías
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.