Literature DB >> 17336008

Post-mortem forensic neuroimaging: correlation of MSCT and MRI findings with autopsy results.

Kathrin Yen1, Karl-Olof Lövblad, Eva Scheurer, Christoph Ozdoba, Michael J Thali, Emin Aghayev, Christian Jackowski, Javier Anon, Nathalie Frickey, Karin Zwygart, Joachim Weis, Richard Dirnhofer.   

Abstract

Multislice-computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are increasingly used for forensic purposes. Based on broad experience in clinical neuroimaging, post-mortem MSCT and MRI were performed in 57 forensic cases with the goal to evaluate the radiological methods concerning their usability for forensic head and brain examination. An experienced clinical radiologist evaluated the imaging data. The results were compared to the autopsy findings that served as the gold standard with regard to common forensic neurotrauma findings such as skull fractures, soft tissue lesions of the scalp, various forms of intracranial hemorrhage or signs of increased brain pressure. The sensitivity of the imaging methods ranged from 100% (e.g., heat-induced alterations, intracranial gas) to zero (e.g., mediobasal impression marks as a sign of increased brain pressure, plaques jaunes). The agreement between MRI and CT was 69%. The radiological methods prevalently failed in the detection of lesions smaller than 3mm of size, whereas they were generally satisfactory concerning the evaluation of intracranial hemorrhage. Due to its advanced 2D and 3D post-processing possibilities, CT in particular possessed certain advantages in comparison with autopsy with regard to forensic reconstruction. MRI showed forensically relevant findings not seen during autopsy in several cases. The partly limited sensitivity of imaging that was observed in this retrospective study was based on several factors: besides general technical limitations it became apparent that clinical radiologists require a sound basic forensic background in order to detect specific signs. Focused teaching sessions will be essential to improve the outcome in future examinations. On the other hand, the autopsy protocols should be further standardized to allow an exact comparison of imaging and autopsy data. In consideration of these facts, MRI and CT have the power to play an important role in future forensic neuropathological examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17336008     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  41 in total

1.  Common and expected postmortem CT observations involving the brain: mimics of antemortem pathology.

Authors:  A B Smith; G E Lattin; P Berran; H T Harcke
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Effectiveness of a worksheet for diagnosing postmortem computed tomography in emergency departments.

Authors:  Naoya Takahashi; Takeshi Higuchi; Motoi Shiotani; Suguru Satou; Yasuo Hirose
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging goes postmortem: noninvasive detection and assessment of myocardial infarction by postmortem MRI.

Authors:  Christian Jackowski; Marcel J B Warntjes; Johan Berge; Walter Bär; Anders Persson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Post-mortem 1.5T MR quantification of regular anatomical brain structures.

Authors:  Wolf-Dieter Zech; Anna-Lena Hottinger; Nicole Schwendener; Frederick Schuster; Anders Persson; Marcel J Warntjes; Christian Jackowski
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 5.  Essentials of forensic post-mortem MR imaging in adults.

Authors:  T D Ruder; M J Thali; G M Hatch
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Relevant findings on postmortem CT and postmortem MRI in hanging, ligature strangulation and manual strangulation and their additional value compared to autopsy - a systematic review.

Authors:  Dominic Gascho; Jakob Heimer; Carlo Tappero; Sarah Schaerli
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  Virtopsy versus digital autopsy: virtual autopsy.

Authors:  C Pomara; V Fineschi; G Scalzo; G Guglielmi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Dating of Early Subdural Haematoma: A Correlative Clinico-Radiological Study.

Authors:  Murali Gundu Rao; Dalbir Singh; Niranjan Khandelwal; Suresh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

9.  A comparative study of cranial, blunt trauma fractures as seen at medicolegal autopsy and by computed tomography.

Authors:  Christina Jacobsen; Birthe H Bech; Niels Lynnerup
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 10.  The value of postmortem computed tomography as an alternative for autopsy in trauma victims: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Scholing; T P Saltzherr; P H P Fung Kon Jin; K J Ponsen; J B Reitsma; J S Lameris; J C Goslings
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.