Literature DB >> 17334811

Prostate volume modifies the association between obesity and prostate cancer or high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Jay H Fowke1, Saundra S Motley, Marcia Wills, Michael S Cookson, Raoul S Concepcion, Charles W Eckstein, Sam S Chang, Joseph A Smith.   

Abstract

The relationship between obesity and prostate cancer remains unclear. We investigated the effect of prostate volume on the obesity and prostate cancer association. With a multi-centered, rapid-recruitment protocol, weight and body size measurements were collected prior to diagnosis, and medical charts were reviewed for pathology results (n = 420 controls, 119 high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) cases, and 286 cancer cases (41% Gleason > 6). In multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for age, PSA levels and history, DRE results, and number of cores at biopsy, the association between BMI and cancer was restricted to men with a smaller prostate volume (volume < 40 cm(3): OR(BMI > or = 30) = 2.17 (1.09, 4.32), p (trend) = 0.02; volume > or = 40 cm(3): OR(BMI > or = 30) = 0.77 (0.34, 1.77), p (trend) = 0.17; p (interaction) = 0.03). Similarly, the WHR and PIN association was significantly modified by prostate volume (volume < 40 cm(3): OR((WHR: Tertile 3 vs. T1)) = 3.76 (1.54, 9.21) (p (trend) < 0.01); volume > or = 40 m(3): OR((WHR: T3 vs. T1)) = 0.63 (0.32, 1.23) (p (trend) = 0.17); p (interaction) < 0.01). In conclusion, prostate volume acts as a modifier, and BMI and WHR are significantly associated with prostate cancer or PIN, respectively, in the absence of biopsy sampling error derived from obesity-related prostate enlargement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17334811     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-007-0119-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  7 in total

1.  Oxidative stress measured by urine F2-isoprostane level is associated with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniel A Barocas; Saundra Motley; Michael S Cookson; Sam S Chang; David F Penson; Qi Dai; Ginger Milne; L Jackson Roberts; Jason Morrow; Raoul S Concepcion; Joseph A Smith; Jay H Fowke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Larger men have larger prostates: Detection bias in epidemiologic studies of obesity and prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Andrew Rundle; Yun Wang; Sudha Sadasivan; Dhananjay A Chitale; Nilesh S Gupta; Deliang Tang; Benjamin A Rybicki
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.104

3.  The effects of body mass index on changes in prostate-specific antigen levels and prostate volume over 15 years of follow-up: implications for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Lauren P Wallner; Hal Morgenstern; Michaela E McGree; Debra J Jacobson; Jennifer L St Sauver; Steven J Jacobsen; Aruna V Sarma
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Obesity and future prostate cancer risk among men after an initial benign biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  Andrew Rundle; Michelle Jankowski; Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Deliang Tang; Benjamin A Rybicki
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Association between biomarkers of obesity and risk of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer--evidence of effect modification by prostate size.

Authors:  Jay H Fowke; Saundra Motley; Qi Dai; Raoul Concepcion; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 6.  [Influence of obesity on urological malignancies].

Authors:  H Eggers; M A Kuczyk; A J Schrader; S Steffens
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Any Correlation Between Prostate Volume and Incidence of Prostate Cancer: A Review of Reported Data for the Last Thirty Years.

Authors:  Justine R Yamashiro; Werner T W de Riese
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-10-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.