Literature DB >> 17333407

Probability biases in genetic problem solving: a comparison of undergraduates, genetic counseling graduate students, and genetic counselors.

Margaret E Dewhurst1, Patricia McCarthy Veach, Claudia Lampman, John Petraitis, Juihsien Kao, Bonnie LeRoy.   

Abstract

Heuristics are mental shortcuts that aid people in everyday problem-solving and decision-making. Although numerous studies have demonstrated their use in contexts ranging from consumers' shopping decisions to experts' estimations of experimental validity, virtually no published research has addressed heuristics use in problems involving genetic conditions and associated risk probabilities. The present research consists of two studies. In the first study, 220 undergraduates attempted to solve four genetic problems--two common heuristic problems modified to focus on genetic likelihood, and two created to study heuristics and probability rule application. Results revealed that the vast majority of undergraduates used heuristics and also demonstrated a complete misuse of probability rules. In the second study, 156 practicing genetic counselors and 89 genetic counseling students solved slightly modified versions of the genetic problems used in Study 1. Results indicated that a large percentage of both genetic counselors and students used heuristics, but the counselors demonstrated superior problem-solving performance compared to both the genetic counseling students and the undergraduates from Study 1. Research, training, and practice recommendations are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17333407     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-006-9050-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  4 in total

1.  The hot hand fallacy and the gambler's fallacy: two faces of subjective randomness?

Authors:  Peter Ayton; Ilan Fischer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

2.  The effect of experiential knowledge on construction of risk perception in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lori d'Agincourt-Canning
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Randomness and inductions from streaks: "gambler's fallacy" versus "hot hand".

Authors:  Bruce D Burns; Bryan Corpus
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

4.  Factors influencing maternal estimates of genetic risk.

Authors:  E E Ekwo; B F Seals; J O Kim; R A Williamson; J W Hanson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1985-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.