Literature DB >> 15789156

The effect of experiential knowledge on construction of risk perception in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

Lori d'Agincourt-Canning1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the connection between experiential knowledge of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer and understandings of personal cancer risk. Using a qualitative research design, the investigator conducted in-depth interviews with 53 individuals (45 female, 8 male) from families at high-risk for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Study results showed that two forms of experiential knowledge, empathetic and embodied knowledge, were integral to participants' constructions of their cancer risk. They also illustrated that knowledge derived from experience often took precedence over objective clinical estimates of risk. The paper discusses the clinical implications of these findings and suggests that counseling strategies, which expand upon patient's lived experience and knowledge of the disease, may enhance communication of genetic risk. Assessment of experiential knowledge promises to suggest new ways to frame genetic information that will enable people to better understand their objective risk or to modify exaggerated and/or inaccurate risk perceptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15789156     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-005-1500-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  41 in total

1.  Knowledge of no return--getting and giving information about genetic risk.

Authors:  L Sachs
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  Predictive genetic testing and beyond: a theory of engagement.

Authors:  Marion McAllister
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2002-09

3.  Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some preliminary indicators.

Authors:  P Hopwood; F Keeling; A Long; C Pool; G Evans; A Howell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  Dealing with the uncertainty of developing a cancer.

Authors:  A E Murphy
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 5.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  We are talking, but are they listening? Communication patterns in families with a history of breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC).

Authors:  Regina Kenen; Audrey Arden-Jones; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  D G Evans; L D Burnell; P Hopwood; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling.

Authors:  S Lloyd; M Watson; B Waites; L Meyer; R Eeles; S Ebbs; A Tylee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  D G Evans; V Blair; R Greenhalgh; P Hopwood; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  46 in total

1.  Beliefs and beyond: what can we learn from qualitative studies of lay people's understandings of cancer risk?

Authors:  Wendy L Lipworth; Heather M Davey; Stacy M Carter; Claire Hooker; Wendy Hu
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Perceived relevance of genetic carrier screening: observations of the role of health-related life experiences and stage of life in decision making.

Authors:  Alison D Archibald; Belinda J McClaren
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-11-17

3.  Probability biases in genetic problem solving: a comparison of undergraduates, genetic counseling graduate students, and genetic counselors.

Authors:  Margaret E Dewhurst; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Claudia Lampman; John Petraitis; Juihsien Kao; Bonnie LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Information processing in the context of genetic risk: implications for genetic-risk communication.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Colin Perrier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  "Awakening to" a new meaning of being at-risk for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a grounded theory study.

Authors:  April Manuel; Fern Brunger
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-01-27

7.  Genetic Testing and Post-Testing Decision Making among BRCA-Positive Mutation Women: A Psychosocial Approach.

Authors:  Sharlene Hesse-Biber; Chen An
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Risking 'Safety': Breast Cancer, Prognosis, and the Strategic Enterprise of Life.

Authors:  Nadine Ehlers
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2016-03

9.  Subjective versus objective risk in genetic counseling for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Anita Caruso; Cristina Vigna; Bruna Marozzo; Fabio M Sega; Isabella Sperduti; Francesco Cognetti; Antonella Savarese
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-21

10.  Risk perception after genetic counseling in patients with increased risk of cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Rantala; Ulla Platten; Gunilla Lindgren; Bo Nilsson; Brita Arver; Annika Lindblom; Yvonne Brandberg
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.