Literature DB >> 17333206

Characterisation of a blowfly male-specific neuron using behaviourally generated visual stimuli.

Christine Trischler1, Norbert Boeddeker, Martin Egelhaaf.   

Abstract

The pursuit system controlling chasing behaviour in male blowflies has to cope with extremely fast and dynamically changing visual input. An identified male-specific visual neuron called Male Lobula Giant 1 (MLG1) is presumably one major element of this pursuit system. Previous behavioural and modelling analyses have indicated that angular target size, retinal target position and target velocity are relevant input variables of the pursuit system. To investigate whether MLG1 specifically represents any of these visual parameters we obtained in vivo intracellular recordings while replaying optical stimuli that simulate the visual signals received by a male fly during chasing manoeuvres. On the basis of these naturalistic stimuli we find that MLG1 shows distinct direction sensitivity and is depolarised if the target motion contains an upward component. The responses of MLG1 are jointly determined by the retinal position, the speed and direction, and the duration of target motimotion. Coherence analysis reveals that although retinal target size and position are in some way inherent in the responses of MLG1, we find no confirmation of the hypothesis that MLG1 encodes any of these parameters exclusively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17333206     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-007-0212-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   2.389


  32 in total

1.  Transfer of visual motion information via graded synapses operates linearly in the natural activity range.

Authors:  R Kurtz; A K Warzecha; M Egelhaaf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Information theoretical evaluation of parametric models of gain control in blowfly photoreceptor cells.

Authors:  J H van Hateren; H P Snippe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Chasing a dummy target: smooth pursuit and velocity control in male blowflies.

Authors:  Norbert Boeddeker; Roland Kern; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Neural networks in the cockpit of the fly.

Authors:  A Borst; J Haag
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Neural images of pursuit targets in the photoreceptor arrays of male and female houseflies Musca domestica.

Authors:  Brian G Burton; Simon B Laughlin
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Visual acuity in insects.

Authors:  M F Land
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 7.  The processing of object and self-motion in the tectofugal and accessory optic pathways of birds.

Authors:  B J Frost; D R Wylie; Y C Wang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Dendritic structure and receptive-field organization of optic flow processing interneurons in the fly.

Authors:  H G Krapp; B Hengstenberg; R Hengstenberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Processing of natural time series of intensities by the visual system of the blowfly.

Authors:  J H van Hateren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Blowfly flight and optic flow. II. Head movements during flight

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  9 in total

1.  Direction Selective Neurons Responsive to Horizontal Motion in a Crab Reflect an Adaptation to Prevailing Movements in Flat Environments.

Authors:  Florencia Scarano; Daniel Tomsic; Julieta Sztarker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Chasing behavior and optomotor following in free-flying male blowflies: flight performance and interactions of the underlying control systems.

Authors:  Christine Trischler; Roland Kern; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 3.  Generation and Evolution of Neural Cell Types and Circuits: Insights from the Drosophila Visual System.

Authors:  Michael Perry; Nikos Konstantinides; Filipe Pinto-Teixeira; Claude Desplan
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 16.830

4.  Neuronal encoding of object and distance information: a model simulation study on naturalistic optic flow processing.

Authors:  Patrick Hennig; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.492

5.  Anatomy of the lobula complex in the brain of the praying mantis compared to the lobula complexes of the locust and cockroach.

Authors:  Ronny Rosner; Joss von Hadeln; Tobias Salden; Uwe Homberg
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Host-trailing satellite flight behaviour is associated with greater investment in peripheral visual sensory system in miltogrammine flies.

Authors:  Carlo Polidori; Marcin Piwczynski; Federico Ronchetti; Nikolas P Johnston; Krzysztof Szpila
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Neuronal representation of visual motion and orientation in the fly medulla.

Authors:  Christian Spalthoff; Ralf Gerdes; Rafael Kurtz
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Spatial vision in insects is facilitated by shaping the dynamics of visual input through behavioral action.

Authors:  Martin Egelhaaf; Norbert Boeddeker; Roland Kern; Rafael Kurtz; Jens P Lindemann
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Two pursuit strategies for a single sensorimotor control task in blowfly.

Authors:  Leandre Varennes; Holger G Krapp; Stephane Viollet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.