RATIONALE: Both psychotropic drugs and mental disorders have typical signatures in quantitative electroencephalography (EEG). Previous studies found that some psychotropic drugs had EEG effects opposite to the EEG effects of the mental disorders treated with these drugs (key-lock principle). OBJECTIVES: We performed a placebo-controlled pharmaco-EEG study on two conventional antipsychotics (chlorpromazine and haloperidol) and four atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, perospirone, quetiapine, and risperidone) in healthy volunteers. We investigated differences between conventional and atypical drug effects and whether the drug effects were compatible with the key-lock principle. METHODS: Fourteen subjects underwent seven EEG recording sessions, one for each drug (dosage equivalent of 1 mg haloperidol). In a time-domain analysis, we quantified the EEG by identifying clusters of transiently stable EEG topographies (microstates). Frequency-domain analysis used absolute power across electrodes and the location of the center of gravity (centroid) of the spatial distribution of power in different frequency bands. RESULTS: Perospirone increased duration of a microstate class typically shortened in schizophrenics. Haloperidol increased mean microstate duration of all classes, increased alpha 1 and beta 1 power, and tended to shift the beta 1 centroid posterior. Quetiapine decreased alpha 1 power and shifted the centroid anterior in both alpha bands. Olanzapine shifted the centroid anterior in alpha 2 and beta 1. CONCLUSIONS: The increased microstate duration under perospirone and haloperidol was opposite to effects previously reported in schizophrenic patients, suggesting a key-lock mechanism. The opposite centroid changes induced by olanzapine and quetiapine compared to haloperidol might characterize the difference between conventional and atypical antipsychotics.
RATIONALE: Both psychotropic drugs and mental disorders have typical signatures in quantitative electroencephalography (EEG). Previous studies found that some psychotropic drugs had EEG effects opposite to the EEG effects of the mental disorders treated with these drugs (key-lock principle). OBJECTIVES: We performed a placebo-controlled pharmaco-EEG study on two conventional antipsychotics (chlorpromazine and haloperidol) and four atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, perospirone, quetiapine, and risperidone) in healthy volunteers. We investigated differences between conventional and atypical drug effects and whether the drug effects were compatible with the key-lock principle. METHODS: Fourteen subjects underwent seven EEG recording sessions, one for each drug (dosage equivalent of 1 mg haloperidol). In a time-domain analysis, we quantified the EEG by identifying clusters of transiently stable EEG topographies (microstates). Frequency-domain analysis used absolute power across electrodes and the location of the center of gravity (centroid) of the spatial distribution of power in different frequency bands. RESULTS:Perospirone increased duration of a microstate class typically shortened in schizophrenics. Haloperidol increased mean microstate duration of all classes, increased alpha 1 and beta 1 power, and tended to shift the beta 1 centroid posterior. Quetiapine decreased alpha 1 power and shifted the centroid anterior in both alpha bands. Olanzapine shifted the centroid anterior in alpha 2 and beta 1. CONCLUSIONS: The increased microstate duration under perospirone and haloperidol was opposite to effects previously reported in schizophrenicpatients, suggesting a key-lock mechanism. The opposite centroid changes induced by olanzapine and quetiapine compared to haloperidol might characterize the difference between conventional and atypical antipsychotics.
Authors: T Isotani; H Tanaka; D Lehmann; R D Pascual-Marqui; K Kochi; N Saito; T Yagyu; T Kinoshita; K Sasada Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: V Strelets; P L Faber; J Golikova; V Novototsky-Vlasov; T Koenig; L R R Gianotti; J H Gruzelier; D Lehmann Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: D Hubl; H Kleinlogel; L Frölich; T Weinandi; K Maurer; W Holstein; J Czekalla; T Dierks Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Robert W Gould; Michael T Nedelcovych; Xuewen Gong; Erica Tsai; Michael Bubser; Thomas M Bridges; Michael R Wood; Mark E Duggan; Nicholas J Brandon; John Dunlop; Michael W Wood; Magnus Ivarsson; Meredith J Noetzel; J Scott Daniels; Colleen M Niswender; Craig W Lindsley; P Jeffrey Conn; Carrie K Jones Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: J Ignacio Serrano; María Dolores Del Castillo; Verónica Cortés; Nuno Mendes; Aida Arroyo; Jorge Andreo; Eduardo Rocon; María Del Valle; Jaime Herreros; Juan Pablo Romero Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 4.677