Howard I Scher1, Mary Warren, Glenn Heller. 1. Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA. scherh@mskcc.org
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore the association between progression-free survival and overall survival time in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with microtubule-targeted therapies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We retrospectively studied patients treated in three trials evaluating a taxane or an epothilone for progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Study subjects were 98 patients with bone metastases; 63 of them also had soft tissue lesions. All scans were reviewed independently. Associations of radiographic progression-free survival and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival with survival time were measured using Kendall's tau, adjusted for right censoring. A smoothing procedure was applied to estimate Kendall's tau within each neighborhood of the follow-up process. RESULTS: The overall associations between progression-free survival time and overall survival time were moderate: 0.4 for radiographic progression-free survival and 0.33 for PSA progression-free survival. The association between radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival was weakest early in the follow-up process, whereas the PSA association was weakest when the progression-free survival-related event (PSA progression, death, or censoring) occurred after 6 months from the start of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Current measures of progression-free survival time for men with castration-resistant prostate cancer are not strongly concordant with survival time. Factors that attenuate the association include interval censoring and the discontinuation of therapy early in the follow-up due to imaging changes that may not reflect true failure of the treatment. For radiographic progression-free survival, the association may be increased by requiring confirmation of progression with a second scan, as is routinely done when assessing response.
PURPOSE: To explore the association between progression-free survival and overall survival time in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with microtubule-targeted therapies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We retrospectively studied patients treated in three trials evaluating a taxane or an epothilone for progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Study subjects were 98 patients with bone metastases; 63 of them also had soft tissue lesions. All scans were reviewed independently. Associations of radiographic progression-free survival and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival with survival time were measured using Kendall's tau, adjusted for right censoring. A smoothing procedure was applied to estimate Kendall's tau within each neighborhood of the follow-up process. RESULTS: The overall associations between progression-free survival time and overall survival time were moderate: 0.4 for radiographic progression-free survival and 0.33 for PSA progression-free survival. The association between radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival was weakest early in the follow-up process, whereas the PSA association was weakest when the progression-free survival-related event (PSA progression, death, or censoring) occurred after 6 months from the start of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Current measures of progression-free survival time for men with castration-resistant prostate cancer are not strongly concordant with survival time. Factors that attenuate the association include interval censoring and the discontinuation of therapy early in the follow-up due to imaging changes that may not reflect true failure of the treatment. For radiographic progression-free survival, the association may be increased by requiring confirmation of progression with a second scan, as is routinely done when assessing response.
Authors: Joan Carles; Daniel Castellano; Miguel Ángel Climent; Pablo Maroto; Rafael Medina; Antonio Alcaraz Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Michael J Morris; Arturo Molina; Eric J Small; Johann S de Bono; Christopher J Logothetis; Karim Fizazi; Paul de Souza; Philip W Kantoff; Celestia S Higano; Jinhui Li; Thian Kheoh; Steven M Larson; Shannon L Matheny; Vahid Naini; Tomasz Burzykowski; Thomas W Griffin; Howard I Scher; Charles J Ryan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-01-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Francois Lamoureux; Christian Thomas; Min-Jean Yin; Hidetoshi Kuruma; Ladan Fazli; Martin E Gleave; Amina Zoubeidi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Howard I Scher; Tomasz M Beer; Celestia S Higano; Aseem Anand; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Eleni Efstathiou; Dana Rathkopf; Julia Shelkey; Evan Y Yu; Joshi Alumkal; David Hung; Mohammad Hirmand; Lynn Seely; Michael J Morris; Daniel C Danila; John Humm; Steve Larson; Martin Fleisher; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-04-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Howard I Scher; Xiaoyu Jia; Johann S de Bono; Martin Fleisher; Kenneth J Pienta; Derek Raghavan; Glenn Heller Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Susan Halabi; Nicholas J Vogelzang; San-San Ou; Kouros Owzar; Laura Archer; Eric J Small Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544