Wenjun Chen1, Liang Li2, Shuangmin Ji3, Xuyang Song4, Wei Lu1, Tianyan Zhou5. 1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmaceutics and New Drug Delivery System, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China. 2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmaceutics and New Drug Delivery System, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China. liliangpkupk@gmail.com. 3. Center for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 5. Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmaceutics and New Drug Delivery System, Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China. tianyanzhou@vip.sina.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aims of this longitudinal model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) were to indirectly compare the time courses of survival probabilities and to identify corresponding potential significant covariates across approved drugs in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS: A systematic literature review for monotherapy studies in patients with CRPC was conducted up to August 8, 2018. The time courses of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were fitted with parametric survival models. Covariate analyses were performed to determine the impact of treatment drugs, dosing regimens, and patient characteristics on the survival probabilities. Simulations were carried out to quantify the magnitude of covariate effects. RESULTS: A total of 146 studies including clinical trials and real-world data on longitudinal survival probabilities in 20,712 patients with CRPC were included in our meta-database. The time courses of PFS and OS probabilities were best described by the log-logistic model. There was no significant difference in median OS and PFS between docetaxel, cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, and enzalutamide. There was no significant dose-response relationship in PFS or OS for docetaxel at 50 to 120 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (Q3W) and cabazitaxel at 20 to 25 mg/m2 Q3W. Model-based simulations indicated that PFS probability was associated with chemotherapy, Gleason score, and baseline prostate-specific antigen (BLPSA), while OS probability was associated with chemotherapy, Gleason score, visceral metastasis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and BLPSA. CONCLUSION: Our modeling and simulation framework can be applied to support indirect comparison, dose selection, and go/no-go decision-making for new agents targeting CRPC.
PURPOSE: The aims of this longitudinal model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) were to indirectly compare the time courses of survival probabilities and to identify corresponding potential significant covariates across approved drugs in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS: A systematic literature review for monotherapy studies in patients with CRPC was conducted up to August 8, 2018. The time courses of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were fitted with parametric survival models. Covariate analyses were performed to determine the impact of treatment drugs, dosing regimens, and patient characteristics on the survival probabilities. Simulations were carried out to quantify the magnitude of covariate effects. RESULTS: A total of 146 studies including clinical trials and real-world data on longitudinal survival probabilities in 20,712 patients with CRPC were included in our meta-database. The time courses of PFS and OS probabilities were best described by the log-logistic model. There was no significant difference in median OS and PFS between docetaxel, cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, and enzalutamide. There was no significant dose-response relationship in PFS or OS for docetaxel at 50 to 120 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (Q3W) and cabazitaxel at 20 to 25 mg/m2 Q3W. Model-based simulations indicated that PFS probability was associated with chemotherapy, Gleason score, and baseline prostate-specific antigen (BLPSA), while OS probability was associated with chemotherapy, Gleason score, visceral metastasis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and BLPSA. CONCLUSION: Our modeling and simulation framework can be applied to support indirect comparison, dose selection, and go/no-go decision-making for new agents targeting CRPC.
Authors: Nicolas Mottet; Noel Clarke; Maria De Santis; Filiberto Zattoni; Juan Morote; Steven Joniau Journal: BJU Int Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Rachel E Sherman; Steven A Anderson; Gerald J Dal Pan; Gerry W Gray; Thomas Gross; Nina L Hunter; Lisa LaVange; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Peter W Marks; Melissa A Robb; Jeffrey Shuren; Robert Temple; Janet Woodcock; Lilly Q Yue; Robert M Califf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William T Lowrance; Mohammad Hassan Murad; William K Oh; David F Jarrard; Matthew J Resnick; Michael S Cookson Journal: J Urol Date: 2018-08-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Michael S Cookson; Bruce J Roth; Philipp Dahm; Christine Engstrom; Stephen J Freedland; Maha Hussain; Daniel W Lin; William T Lowrance; Mohammad Hassan Murad; William K Oh; David F Penson; Adam S Kibel Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Raphael B Moreira; Marcio Debiasi; Edoardo Francini; Pier V Nuzzo; Guillermo De Velasco; Fernando C Maluf; Andre P Fay; Joaquim Bellmunt; Toni K Choueiri; Fabio A Schutz Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-08-08
Authors: Yashar Khoshkar; Marcus Westerberg; Jan Adolfsson; Anna Bill-Axelson; Henrik Olsson; Martin Eklund; Olof Akre; Hans Garmo; Markus Aly Journal: BJUI Compass Date: 2021-10-10