Literature DB >> 17329681

Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy.

B Saar1, A Meining, A Beer, M Settles, H Helmberger, E Frimberger, E J Rummeny, T Rösch.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective trial was to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) in comparison with conventional colonoscopy (CC). A total of 120 consecutive patients with clinical indications for CC were prospectively examined using MRC (1.5 Tesla) which was then followed by CC. Prior to MRC, the cleansed colon was filled with a gadolinium-water solution. A 3D GRE sequence was performed with the patient in the prone and supine position, each acquired during one breathhold period. After division of the colon into five segments, interactive data analysis was carried out using three-dimensional post-processing, including a virtual intraluminal view. The results of CC served as a reference standard. In all patients MRC was performed successfully and no complications occurred. Image quality was diagnostic in 92% (574/620 colonic segments). On a per-patient basis, the results of MRC were as follows: sensitivity 84% (95% CI 71.7-92.3%), specificity 97% (95% CI 89.0-99.6%). Five flat adenomas and 6/16 small polyps (< or =5 mm) were not identified by MRC. MRC offers high sensitivity and excellent specificity rates in patients with clinical indications for CC. Improved MRC techniques are needed to detect small polyps and flat adenomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17329681     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/83959666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  7 in total

1.  Magnetic Resonance (MR) Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-09-01

2.  Screening methods for early detection of colorectal cancers and polyps: summary of evidence-based analyses.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-09-01

3.  In vivo MRI virtual colonography in a mouse model of colon cancer.

Authors:  Lilia V Ileva; Marcelino Bernardo; Matthew R Young; Lisa A Riffle; James L Tatum; Joseph D Kalen; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Colorectal neoplasm: magnetic resonance colonography with fat enema-initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Shuai Zhang; Jun-Wei Peng; Qiang-Ying Shi; Feng Tang; Min-Guo Zhong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Colonoscopy detects significantly more flat adenomas than 3-tesla magnetic resonance colonography: a pilot trial.

Authors:  Robert Hüneburg; Guido Kukuk; Jacob Nattermann; Christoph Endler; Arndt-Hendrik Penner; Karsten Wolter; Hans Schild; Christian Strassburg; Tilman Sauerbruch; Volker Schmitz; Winfried Willinek
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-01-28

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies.

Authors:  Frank M Zijta; Shandra Bipat; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Development of a colonoscopy add-on device for improvement of the intubation process.

Authors:  Jonathan D Litten; Junghun Choi; David Drozek
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2011-12-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.