Literature DB >> 1732952

Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: evaluation with MR imaging.

T Masui1, S Finck, C B Higgins.   

Abstract

Twenty-nine patients who were referred with the possible diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis underwent electrocardiographically gated transverse spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to determine the accuracy of spin-echo MR imaging for the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis and to compare the morphologic features of constrictive pericarditis with those of restrictive cardiomyopathy as seen on spin-echo MR images. Constrictive pericarditis was verified by means of surgery and/or catheterization in 17 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR imaging in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis were 88%, 100%, and 93%, respectively. Thickened pericardium was observed in 88% of patients with proved constrictive pericarditis. Pericardial thickening was not identified in patients with restrictive myocarditis (n = 4). The most frequent site of pericardial thickening was over the right ventricle. In constrictive pericarditis, the signal intensity of the thickened pericardium was similar or decreased compared with that of the myocardium. Indirect findings of impaired right ventricular diastolic filling (eg, dilatation of the inferior vena cava and right atrium) were identified in constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. MR imaging can serve as a noninvasive examination for the definitive diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis and can help distinguish between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy on the basis of pericardial thickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1732952     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.182.2.1732952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  46 in total

1.  New black blood pulse sequence for studies of the heart.

Authors:  S Campos; V Martinez Sanjuan; J J Garcia Nieto; V Belloch; A Lucas; M J Masip; P Nogues; J C Martinez; G Zannoli; H Lejay; J Celma
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-04

Review 2.  Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: a diagnostic dilemma.

Authors:  R A Nishimura
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Large Pericardial Effusions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-08

4.  The conservation and divergence of telomeric structures, effects, and functions.

Authors:  H W Bass
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  MRI of myocardial and pericardial disease.

Authors:  G P Reddy
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Pericardial disease--anatomy and function.

Authors:  C R Peebles; J S Shambrook; S P Harden
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Lesson of the week: restrictive-constrictive heart failure masquerading as liver disease.

Authors:  M D Lowe; A A Harcombe; A A Grace; M C Petch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-27

Review 8.  Clinical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Constantin B Marcu; Aernout M Beek; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  New Cardiac Imaging Algorithms to Diagnose Constrictive Pericarditis Versus Restrictive Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ahmad Mahmoud; Manish Bansal; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Isolated left ventricular apical hypoplasia: a new congenital anomaly described with cardiac tomography.

Authors:  M Fernandez-Valls; M B Srichai; A E Stillman; R D White
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.