OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association of the estrogen and progestin potency of combined oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) with epithelial ovarian carcinoma risk. METHODS: This population-based case-control study included 745 women with incident, histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian carcinoma and 943 controls, matched on age and ethnicity. Data were collected using a standard questionnaire, picture albums, and calendars. The association of OCP potency with epithelial ovarian carcinoma risk was modeled using unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: When compared with women who never used hormonal contraception, users of OCPs with low estrogen (equal to or less than 0.035 mg ethinyl estradiol) and low progestin (less than 0.3 mg norgestrel) were at significantly reduced risk of ovarian carcinoma (odds ratio 0.19; 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.75). The risk among these women was lower than among users of estrogen or progestin of high potency, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, in a subset of 205 women who reported exclusive use of norethindrone, users of 0.5 mg or less, had a significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer compared with women using 10 mg of this progestin. Increased norethindrone dose resulted in a significant increase in ovarian carcinoma risk, indicating a dose-response association. CONCLUSION: Combined OCPs were effective at decreasing the risk of epithelial ovarian carcinoma, with the strongest risk reduction associated with low-potency formulations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association of the estrogen and progestin potency of combined oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) with epithelial ovarian carcinoma risk. METHODS: This population-based case-control study included 745 women with incident, histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian carcinoma and 943 controls, matched on age and ethnicity. Data were collected using a standard questionnaire, picture albums, and calendars. The association of OCP potency with epithelial ovarian carcinoma risk was modeled using unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: When compared with women who never used hormonal contraception, users of OCPs with low estrogen (equal to or less than 0.035 mg ethinyl estradiol) and low progestin (less than 0.3 mg norgestrel) were at significantly reduced risk of ovarian carcinoma (odds ratio 0.19; 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.75). The risk among these women was lower than among users of estrogen or progestin of high potency, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, in a subset of 205 women who reported exclusive use of norethindrone, users of 0.5 mg or less, had a significantly reduced risk of ovarian cancer compared with women using 10 mg of this progestin. Increased norethindrone dose resulted in a significant increase in ovarian carcinoma risk, indicating a dose-response association. CONCLUSION: Combined OCPs were effective at decreasing the risk of epithelial ovarian carcinoma, with the strongest risk reduction associated with low-potency formulations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Authors: Amy L Shafrir; Helena Schock; Elizabeth M Poole; Kathryn L Terry; Rulla M Tamimi; Susan E Hankinson; Bernard A Rosner; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Marc T Goodman; Galina Lurie; Pamela J Thompson; Katharine E McDuffie; Michael E Carney Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2008-07-30 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Francesmary Modugno; Robin Laskey; Ashlee L Smith; Courtney L Andersen; Paul Haluska; Steffi Oesterreich Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Jennifer Prescott; Kimberly A Bertrand; Elizabeth M Poole; Bernard A Rosner; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Minh Tung Phung; Alice W Lee; Anna H Wu; Andrew Berchuck; Kathleen R Cho; Daniel W Cramer; Jennifer Anne Doherty; Marc T Goodman; Gillian E Hanley; Holly R Harris; Karen McLean; Francesmary Modugno; Kirsten B Moysich; Bhramar Mukherjee; Joellen M Schildkraut; Kathryn L Terry; Linda J Titus; Susan J Jordan; Penelope M Webb; Malcolm C Pike; Celeste Leigh Pearce Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 4.090