Literature DB >> 33619020

Depot-Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Use Is Associated with Decreased Risk of Ovarian Cancer: The Mounting Evidence of a Protective Role of Progestins.

Minh Tung Phung1, Alice W Lee2, Anna H Wu3, Andrew Berchuck4, Kathleen R Cho5, Daniel W Cramer6,7, Jennifer Anne Doherty8, Marc T Goodman9, Gillian E Hanley10, Holly R Harris11, Karen McLean12, Francesmary Modugno13,14, Kirsten B Moysich15, Bhramar Mukherjee1,16, Joellen M Schildkraut17, Kathryn L Terry6,7, Linda J Titus, Susan J Jordan18, Penelope M Webb, Malcolm C Pike3,19, Celeste Leigh Pearce.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combined oral contraceptive use is associated with a decreased risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (ovarian cancer). There is suggestive evidence of an inverse association between progestin-only contraceptive use and ovarian cancer risk, but previous studies have been underpowered.
METHODS: The current study used primary data from 7,977 women with ovarian cancer and 11,820 control women in seven case-control studies from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium to evaluate the association between use of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), an injectable progestin-only contraceptive, and ovarian cancer risk. Logistic models were fit to determine the association between ever use of DMPA and ovarian cancer risk overall and by histotype. A systematic review of the association between DMPA use and ovarian cancer risk was conducted.
RESULTS: Ever use of DMPA was associated with a 35% decreased risk of ovarian cancer overall (OR, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.85). There was a statistically significant trend of decreasing risk with increasing duration of use (P trend < 0.001). The systematic review yielded six studies, four of which showed an inverse association and two showed increased risk.
CONCLUSIONS: DMPA use appears to be associated with a decreased risk of ovarian cancer in a duration-dependent manner based on the preponderance of evidence. Further study of the mechanism through which DMPA use is associated with ovarian cancer is warranted. IMPACT: The results of this study are of particular interest given the rise in popularity of progestin-releasing intrauterine devices that have a substantially lower progestin dose than that in DMPA, but may have a stronger local effect. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33619020      PMCID: PMC9281627          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.090


  38 in total

1.  Progesterone-induced apoptosis in immortalized normal and malignant human ovarian surface epithelial cells involves enhanced expression of FasL.

Authors:  Viqar Syed; Shuk-Mei Ho
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 2.  Intrauterine contraception: the pendulum swings back.

Authors:  Laura MacIsaac; Eve Espey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Apoptosis induced by progesterone in human ovarian cancer cell line SNU-840.

Authors:  S Yu; M Lee; S Shin; J Park
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.429

4.  Association between DNA damage response and repair genes and risk of invasive serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Joellen M Schildkraut; Edwin S Iversen; Melanie A Wilson; Merlise A Clyde; Patricia G Moorman; Rachel T Palmieri; Regina Whitaker; Rex C Bentley; Jeffrey R Marks; Andrew Berchuck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Talcum powder, chronic pelvic inflammation and NSAIDs in relation to risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Melissa A Merritt; Adèle C Green; Christina M Nagle; Penelope M Webb
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Risk of breast, uterine corpus, and ovarian cancer in women receiving medroxyprogesterone injections.

Authors:  A P Liang; A G Levenson; P M Layde; J D Shelton; R A Hatcher; M Potts; M J Michelson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-06-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use is associated with a decreased risk of ovarian and endometrial cancer, without increased risk of breast cancer. Results from the NOWAC Study.

Authors:  Mie Jareid; Jean-Christophe Thalabard; Morten Aarflot; Hege M Bøvelstad; Eiliv Lund; Tonje Braaten
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Combined oral contraceptive use and epithelial ovarian cancer risk: time-related effects.

Authors:  Galina Lurie; Lynne R Wilkens; Pamela J Thompson; Katharine E McDuffie; Michael E Carney; Keith Y Terada; Marc T Goodman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mary Anne Rossing; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Kristine G Wicklund; Jennifer A Doherty; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.

Authors:  Mourad Ouzzani; Hossam Hammady; Zbys Fedorowicz; Ahmed Elmagarmid
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-05
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Beyond the pill: contraception and the prevention of hereditary ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yue Yin Xia; Joanne Kotsopoulos
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.164

Review 2.  Risk-Reducing Options for High-Grade Serous Gynecologic Malignancy in BRCA1/2.

Authors:  Lauren Clarfield; Laura Diamond; Michelle Jacobson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.