Literature DB >> 17329444

Preclinical evaluation of microneedle technology for intradermal delivery of influenza vaccines.

Jason B Alarcon1, Andrea Waterston Hartley, Noel G Harvey, John A Mikszta.   

Abstract

Recent clinical studies have suggested that, for certain strains of influenza virus, intradermal (i.d.) delivery may enable protective immune responses using a lower dose of vaccine than required by intramuscular (i.m.) injection. Here, we describe the first preclinical use of microneedle technology for i.d. administration of three different types of influenza vaccines: (i) a whole inactivated influenza virus, (ii) a trivalent split-virion human vaccine, and (iii) a plasmid DNA encoding the influenza virus hemagglutinin. In a rat model, i.d. delivery of the whole inactivated virus provided up to 100-fold dose sparing compared to i.m. injection. In addition, i.d. delivery of the trivalent human vaccine enabled at least 10-fold dose sparing for the H1N1 strain and elicited levels of response across the dose range similar to those of i.m. injection for the H3N2 and B strains. Furthermore, at least fivefold dose sparing from i.d. delivery was evident in animals treated with multiple doses of DNA plasmid vaccine, although such effects were not apparent after the first immunization. Altogether, the results demonstrate that microneedle-based i.d. delivery elicits antibody responses that are at least as strong as via i.m. injection and that, in many cases, dose sparing can be achieved by this new immunization method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17329444      PMCID: PMC1865614          DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00387-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol        ISSN: 1556-679X


  45 in total

Review 1.  Models of respiratory immunotoxicology and host resistance.

Authors:  G R Burleson
Journal:  Immunopharmacology       Date:  2000-07-25

2.  Immunogenicity of a monovalent, aluminum-adjuvanted influenza whole virus vaccine for pandemic use.

Authors:  N Hehme; H Engelmann; W Kuenzel; E Neumeier; R Saenger
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.303

3.  Dose sparing with intradermal injection of influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Richard T Kenney; Sarah A Frech; Larry R Muenz; Christina P Villar; Gregory M Glenn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Cutaneous dendritic cells.

Authors:  Jenny Valladeau; Sem Saeland
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 11.130

Review 5.  Dendritic-cell trafficking to lymph nodes through lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  Gwendalyn J Randolph; Veronique Angeli; Melody A Swartz
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 53.106

6.  Hemagglutinin (HA) proteins from H1 and H3 serotypes of influenza A viruses require different antigen designs for the induction of optimal protective antibody responses as studied by codon-optimized HA DNA vaccines.

Authors:  Shixia Wang; Jessica Taaffe; Christopher Parker; Alicia Solórzano; Hong Cao; Adolfo García-Sastre; Shan Lu
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Vaccine manufacturing: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Ulmer; Ulrich Valley; Rino Rappuoli
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 8.  Vaccine shortages: history, impact, and prospects for the future.

Authors:  Alan R Hinman; Walter A Orenstein; Jeanne M Santoli; Lance E Rodewald; Stephen L Cochi
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 21.981

9.  Low-dose intradermal administration of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in children: 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Z Kurugöl; S Erensoy; S Akşit; A Egemen; A Bilgiç
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2001-07-16       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Reduced-dose intradermal vaccination against hepatitis A with an aluminum-free vaccine is immunogenic and can lower costs.

Authors:  Chitsanu Pancharoen; Jutarat Mekmullica; Usa Thisyakorn; Songsri Kasempimolporn; Henry Wilde; Christian Herzog
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  52 in total

1.  DNA vaccination in the skin using microneedles improves protection against influenza.

Authors:  Jae-Min Song; Yeu-Chun Kim; Eunju O; Richard W Compans; Mark R Prausnitz; Sang-Moo Kang
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  In vivo, in situ imaging of microneedle insertion into the skin of human volunteers using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Siôn A Coulman; James C Birchall; Aneesh Alex; Marc Pearton; Bernd Hofer; Conor O'Mahony; Wolfgang Drexler; Boris Považay
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Microneedles with intrinsic immunoadjuvant properties: microfabrication, protein stability, and modulated release.

Authors:  Alexander K Andrianov; Alexander Marin; Daniel P DeCollibus
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Transdermal delivery of macromolecules using solid-state biodegradable microstructures.

Authors:  Janet R Wendorf; Esi B Ghartey-Tagoe; Stephen C Williams; Elena Enioutina; Parminder Singh; Gary W Cleary
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Microneedle vaccination with stabilized recombinant influenza virus hemagglutinin induces improved protective immunity.

Authors:  William C Weldon; Maria P Martin; Vladimir Zarnitsyn; Baozhong Wang; Dimitrios Koutsonanos; Ioanna Skountzou; Mark R Prausnitz; Richard W Compans
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-02-02

Review 6.  Microneedle-Mediated Vaccine Delivery to the Oral Mucosa.

Authors:  Rachel L Creighton; Kim A Woodrow
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 7.  Polymeric microneedles for transdermal protein delivery.

Authors:  Yanqi Ye; Jicheng Yu; Di Wen; Anna R Kahkoska; Zhen Gu
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Microneedle arrays allow lower microbial penetration than hypodermic needles in vitro.

Authors:  Ryan F Donnelly; Thakur Raghu Raj Singh; Michael M Tunney; Desmond I J Morrow; Paul A McCarron; Conor O'Mahony; A David Woolfson
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Poly[di(carboxylatophenoxy)phosphazene] is a potent adjuvant for intradermal immunization.

Authors:  Alexander K Andrianov; Daniel P DeCollibus; Helice A Gillis; Henry H Kha; Alexander Marin; Mark R Prausnitz; Lorne A Babiuk; Hugh Townsend; George Mutwiri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Micro-scale devices for transdermal drug delivery.

Authors:  Anubhav Arora; Mark R Prausnitz; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 5.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.