Literature DB >> 15163505

Immunogenicity of a monovalent, aluminum-adjuvanted influenza whole virus vaccine for pandemic use.

N Hehme1, H Engelmann, W Kuenzel, E Neumeier, R Saenger.   

Abstract

In the case of an influenza pandemic a significant gap between influenza vaccine manufacturing capacities and vaccine demands must be expected on a global scale. This study explores the possibility to increase the number of vaccine doses that can be provided with the existing resources by using a lower amount of antigen per dose in an aluminum-adjuvanted whole virus vaccine formulation, instead of the standard dosage of 15 microg hemagglutinin (HA). The study was performed as an open, non-controlled, randomized, multicentric study in 200 volunteers (18-30 years of age). Three monovalent aluminum-adjuvanted whole virus formulations with different antigen concentrations (1.9, 3.75 and 7.5 microg HA per dose) were compared to a split virus vaccine (15 microg HA per dose) without aluminum adjuvantation. The sera were tested for hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies, neuraminidase inhibition (NI) antibodies and virus neutralizing (VN) antibodies. Nasal swab samples were tested for influenza-specific IgA antibodies. All volunteers were immunologically naïve to the vaccine strain influenza A/Singapore/1/57 (H2N2). The vaccine was well tolerated. HI titers reached protective levels (geometric mean titer (GMT) >1:40) after two vaccine doses. In the group immunized with the lowest antigen dose the seroprotection rate was 82%. Although the immune response tends to be lower for vaccine formulations with reduced antigen content, the immunogenicity criteria as defined by the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) were met with all antigen formulations after two vaccine doses. Significant increases in HI, NI and VN titers were observed, however, no significant local immune response was detected. The use of a low-dose whole virus influenza vaccine, adjuvanted with aluminum appears to be a viable approach to increase vaccine supplies in a pandemic situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15163505     DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2004.02.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virus Res        ISSN: 0168-1702            Impact factor:   3.303


  39 in total

Review 1.  The threat of avian influenza A (H5N1). Part IV: Development of vaccines.

Authors:  Jindrich Cinatl; Martin Michaelis; Hans W Doerr
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated influenza A/H5N1 vaccine given with or without aluminum hydroxide to healthy adults: results of a phase I-II randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Wendy A Keitel; James D Campbell; John J Treanor; Emmanuel B Walter; Shital M Patel; Fenhua He; Diana L Noah; Heather Hill
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Evaluation of multivalent H2 influenza pandemic vaccines in mice.

Authors:  Brian J Lenny; Stephanie Sonnberg; Angela F Danner; Kimberly Friedman; Richard J Webby; Robert G Webster; Jeremy C Jones
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Preclinical evaluation of microneedle technology for intradermal delivery of influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Jason B Alarcon; Andrea Waterston Hartley; Noel G Harvey; John A Mikszta
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-02-28

Review 5.  Immunogenetics of seasonal influenza vaccine response.

Authors:  Gregory A Poland; Inna G Ovsyannikova; Robert M Jacobson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Fc receptor is not required for inducing antibodies but plays a critical role in conferring protection after influenza M2 vaccination.

Authors:  Yu-Na Lee; Young-Tae Lee; Min-Chul Kim; Hye Suk Hwang; Jong Seok Lee; Ki-Hye Kim; Sang-Moo Kang
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.397

7.  Safety and immunogenicity of inactivated, Vero cell culture-derived whole virus influenza A/H5N1 vaccine given alone or with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant in healthy adults.

Authors:  Wendy A Keitel; Cornelia L Dekker; ChrisAnna Mink; James D Campbell; Kathryn M Edwards; Shital M Patel; Dora Y Ho; Helen K Talbot; Kuo Guo; Diana L Noah; Heather Hill
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Safety and immunogenicity of a subvirion inactivated influenza A/H5N1 vaccine with or without aluminum hydroxide among healthy elderly adults.

Authors:  Rebecca C Brady; John J Treanor; Robert L Atmar; Wendy A Keitel; Robert Edelman; Wilbur H Chen; Patricia Winokur; Robert Belshe; Irene L Graham; Diana Lee Noah; Kuo Guo; Heather Hill
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Quality and kinetics of the antibody response in mice after three different low-dose influenza virus vaccination strategies.

Authors:  Solveig Hauge; Abdullah Madhun; Rebecca Jane Cox; Lars Reinhardt Haaheim
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-06-27

Review 10.  Influenza: the virus and prophylaxis with inactivated influenza vaccine in "at risk" groups, including COPD patients.

Authors:  Arnt-Ove Hovden; Rebecca Jane Cox; Lars Reinhardt Haaheim
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.