Literature DB >> 1732937

Mammographic analysis of calcifications.

L W Bassett1.   

Abstract

Because mammographically detected calcifications are frequently the only sign of breast cancer, the breast radiography equipment, screen-film imaging package, and film processing should be optimized to detect such calcifications. For this purpose, dedicated units with molybdenum targets, microfocal spot magnification capability, reciprocating grids, and high output x-ray tubes are required. With the greater use of state-of-the-art mammography, intraductal carcinoma, or DCIS, manifested only by calcifications is being detected more frequently than ever. DCIS can be of the comedo, cribriform, or micropapillary types. Comedocarcinoma, characterized by linear and branching (casting) calcifications, is the most aggressive type, and it has the highest rate of recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Cribriform and micropapillary calcifications are characteristically punctate and vary in size and shape. In addition to histologic type, the recurrence of DCIS is related to its extent at detection and whether adequate tissue was removed at the time of breast-conserving surgery. Biopsies for suspicious calcifications should be followed immediately by specimen radiography to verify their removal. If breast-conserving surgery is elected for DCIS, the resected segment of tissue should be examined with pathologic techniques designed to determine whether the margins are clear of tumor. For DCIS and invasive cancers with extensive intraductal component, microfocus magnification mammography over the surgical site is recommended prior to radiotherapy to identify any residual tumor calcifications. Although state-of-the-art mammography is very sensitive in the detection of calcifications, it is low in specificity, thus resulting in a large number of false-positive mammograms and a relatively low true-positive biopsy rate. While some benign calcifications cannot be distinguished from those of malignancy, the number of biopsies for benign conditions can be decreased by careful analysis of the mammograms in a search for features indicating benignity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1732937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  18 in total

1.  Detection of microcalcifications by means of multiscale methods and statistical techniques.

Authors:  R Mata Campos; E M Vidal; E Nava; M Martínez-Morillo; F Sendra
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Monckeberg medial calcific sclerosis mimicking malignant calcification pattern at mammography.

Authors:  A Saxena; I C Waddell; R W Friesen; R T Michalski
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: correlations between high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology.

Authors:  Yoshihide Kanemaki; Yasuyuki Kurihara; Kyoko Okamoto; Yasuo Nakajima; Mamoru Fukuda; Ichiro Maeda; Futoshi Akiyama
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-01-25

4.  The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?

Authors:  Ayano Akita; Akihiro Tanimoto; Hiromitsu Jinno; Kaori Kameyama; Sachio Kuribayashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Synthesis of conjugatable bisphosphonates for molecular imaging of large animals.

Authors:  Kumar R Bhushan; Eiichi Tanaka; John V Frangioni
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Precision biopsy of breast microcalcifications: An improvement in surgical excision.

Authors:  You Peng; Zhong-Yao Luo; Jie Ni; Hai-Dong Cui; Bei Lu; Ai-Zhai Xiang; Jun Zhou; Jin-Wang Ding; Wen-Hui Chen; Jing Zhao; Jian-Hua Fang; Pan Zhao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  "Hippocrates-mst": a prototype for computer-aided microcalcification analysis and risk assessment for breast cancer.

Authors:  George Spyrou; Smaragda Kapsimalakou; Antonis Frigas; Konstantinos Koufopoulos; Stamatios Vassilaros; Panos Ligomenides
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 8.  Current management of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  A Barth; R J Brenner; A E Giuliano
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-10

9.  3-5 BI-RADs Microcalcifications: Correlation between MRI and Histological Findings.

Authors:  Valeria Fiaschetti; Chiara Adriana Pistolese; Tommaso Perretta; Elsa Cossu; Chiara Arganini; Claudia Salimbeni; Angela Lia Scarano; Silvia Arduini; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2011-08-25

10.  The added diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 3.0 T in nonpalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  Laura G Merckel; Helena M Verkooijen; Nicky H G M Peters; Ritse M Mann; Wouter B Veldhuis; Remmert K Storm; Teun Weits; Katya M Duvivier; Thijs van Dalen; Willem P Th M Mali; Petra H M Peeters; Maurice A A J van den Bosch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.