OBJECTIVE: The chronic hypoxia of high-altitude (>/=2500 m) residence has been shown to decrease birth weight in all populations studied to date. However, multigenerational high-altitude populations appear protected relative to newcomer groups. This study aimed to determine whether such protection exists independently of other factors known to influence fetal growth and whether admixed populations (ie, people having both high- and low-altitude ancestry) show an intermediate level of protection. DESIGN: 3551 medical records from consecutive deliveries to Andean, European or Mestizo (ie, admixed) women at low, intermediate or high altitudes in Bolivia were evaluated for maternal characteristics influencing fetal growth as measured by birth weight and the frequency of small for gestational age births (SGA or </=10th percentile birth weight for gestational age and sex). Two-way analysis of variance and chi(2) tests were used to compare maternal and infant characteristics. The effects of ancestry or altitude on SGA and birth weight were assessed using logistic or linear regression models, respectively. RESULTS: Altitude decreased birth weight and increased SGA in all ancestry groups. Andean infants weighed more and were less often SGA than Mestizo or European infants at high altitude (13%, 16% and 33% respectively, p<0.01). After accounting for the influences of maternal hypertensive complications of pregnancy, parity, body weight, and number of prenatal visits, European relative to Andean ancestry increased the frequency of SGA at high altitude nearly fivefold. CONCLUSIONS: Andean relative to European ancestry protects against altitude-associated reductions in fetal growth. The intermediate protection seen in the admixed (Mestizo) group is consistent with the influence of genetic or other Andean-specific protective characteristics.
OBJECTIVE: The chronic hypoxia of high-altitude (>/=2500 m) residence has been shown to decrease birth weight in all populations studied to date. However, multigenerational high-altitude populations appear protected relative to newcomer groups. This study aimed to determine whether such protection exists independently of other factors known to influence fetal growth and whether admixed populations (ie, people having both high- and low-altitude ancestry) show an intermediate level of protection. DESIGN: 3551 medical records from consecutive deliveries to Andean, European or Mestizo (ie, admixed) women at low, intermediate or high altitudes in Bolivia were evaluated for maternal characteristics influencing fetal growth as measured by birth weight and the frequency of small for gestational age births (SGA or </=10th percentile birth weight for gestational age and sex). Two-way analysis of variance and chi(2) tests were used to compare maternal and infant characteristics. The effects of ancestry or altitude on SGA and birth weight were assessed using logistic or linear regression models, respectively. RESULTS: Altitude decreased birth weight and increased SGA in all ancestry groups. Andean infants weighed more and were less often SGA than Mestizo or European infants at high altitude (13%, 16% and 33% respectively, p<0.01). After accounting for the influences of maternal hypertensive complications of pregnancy, parity, body weight, and number of prenatal visits, European relative to Andean ancestry increased the frequency of SGA at high altitude nearly fivefold. CONCLUSIONS: Andean relative to European ancestry protects against altitude-associated reductions in fetal growth. The intermediate protection seen in the admixed (Mestizo) group is consistent with the influence of genetic or other Andean-specific protective characteristics.
Authors: José Villar; Eliette Valladares; Daniel Wojdyla; Nelly Zavaleta; Guillermo Carroli; Alejandro Velazco; Archana Shah; Liana Campodónico; Vicente Bataglia; Anibal Faundes; Ana Langer; Alberto Narváez; Allan Donner; Mariana Romero; Sofia Reynoso; Karla Simônia de Pádua; Daniel Giordano; Marius Kublickas; Arnaldo Acosta Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-06-03 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: S Zamudio; T Droma; K Y Norkyel; G Acharya; J A Zamudio; S N Niermeyer; L G Moore Journal: Am J Phys Anthropol Date: 1993-06 Impact factor: 2.868
Authors: Marco Vargas; Enrique Vargas; Colleen G Julian; J Fernando Armaza; Armando Rodriguez; Wilma Tellez; Susan Niermeyer; Megan Wilson; Esteban Parra; Mark Shriver; Lorna G Moore Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2007-07-03 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Jordan Santos-Concejero; F Billaut; L Grobler; J Oliván; T D Noakes; R Tucker Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Norina N Gassmann; Hugo A van Elteren; Tom G Goos; Claudia R Morales; Maria Rivera-Ch; Daniel S Martin; Patricia Cabala Peralta; Agustin Passano Del Carpio; Saul Aranibar Machaca; Luis Huicho; Irwin K M Reiss; Max Gassmann; Rogier C J de Jonge Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2016-07-21
Authors: Ramón A Lorca; Christopher J Matarazzo; Elise S Bales; Julie A Houck; David J Orlicky; Anna G Euser; Colleen G Julian; Lorna G Moore Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 4.733