Literature DB >> 17329167

Perception of comfort during transcranial DC stimulation: effect of NaCl solution concentration applied to sponge electrodes.

J E Dundas1, G W Thickbroom, F L Mastaglia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between perception of comfort and electrolyte concentration and applied voltage during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
METHODS: NaCl solutions (15, 140 and 220 mM NaCl) or deionised water were used as electrolytes to dampen tDCS sponge electrodes. Subjects (14, 7 M, 20-60 years of age) rated comfort on an 11-point scale during 2 min of tDCS (1 mA).
RESULTS: Overall participants rated tDCS as comfortable. Perception of comfort was negatively correlated with NaCl concentration (Spearman's rho=-0.88; p<0.05), and a logarithmic relationship was found between applied voltage and ionic strength of electrolytes (Pearson's r=-0.635; p<0.01). There was no relationship between applied voltage and perception of comfort.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of NaCl solutions between 15 and 140 mM to sponge electrodes is more likely to be perceived as comfortable during tDCS. SIGNIFICANCE: The reporting of solution concentration and ratings of perception would be useful adjuncts to tDCS studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17329167     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  43 in total

1.  Cutaneous perception during tDCS: role of electrode shape and sponge salinity.

Authors:  Preet Minhas; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Varun Bansal; Julian Diaz; Jinal Patel; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  No Effect of 2 mA Anodal tDCS Over the M1 on Performance and Practice Effect on Grooved Pegboard Test and Trail Making Test B

Authors:  Asbjørn J Fagerlund; Janita L Freili; Therese L Danielsen; Per M Aslaksen
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2015-08-31

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: a general system for quantifying transcranial electrotherapy dosage.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Peter Bulow; John W Stiller; Abhishek Datta; Fortunato Battaglia; Sergei V Karnup; Teodor T Postolache
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 5.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 6.  Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Luciana Santos; Mark D Peterson; Margaret Ehinger
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 7.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS.

Authors:  Preet Minhas; Varun Bansal; Jinal Patel; Johnson S Ho; Julian Diaz; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Sudha Kilaru Kessler; Peter E Turkeltaub; Jennifer G Benson; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Enhancement of pinch force in the lower leg by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Satoshi Tanaka; Takashi Hanakawa; Manabu Honda; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.