Literature DB >> 17328216

Power generation using different cation, anion, and ultrafiltration membranes in microbial fuel cells.

Jung Rae Kim1, Shaoan Cheng, Sang-Eun Oh, Bruce E Logan.   

Abstract

Proton exchange membranes (PEMs) are often used in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) to separate the liquid in the anode and cathode chambers while allowing protons to pass between the chambers. However, negatively or positively charged species present at high concentrations in the medium can also be used to maintain charge balance during power generation. An anion exchange membrane (AEM) produced the largest power density (up to 610 mW/m2) and Coulombic efficiency (72%) in MFCs relative to values achieved with a commonly used PEM (Nafion), a cation exchange membrane (CEM), or three different ultrafiltration (UF) membranes with molecular weight cut offs of 0.5K, 1K, and 3K Daltons in different types of MFCs. The increased performance of the AEM was due to proton charge-transfer facilitated by phosphate anions and low internal resistance. The type of membrane affected maximum power densities in two-chamber, air-cathode cube MFCs (C-MFCs) with low internal resistance (84-91 omega for all membranes except UF-0.5K) but not in two-chamber aqueous-cathode bottle MFCs (B-MFCs) due to their higher internal resistances (1230-1272 omega except UF-0.5K). The UF-0.5K membrane produced very high internal resistances (6009 omega, B-MFC; 1814omega, C-MFC) and was the least permeable to both oxygen (mass transfer coefficient of k(O) = 0.19 x 10(-4) cm/s) and acetate (k(A) = 0.89 x 10(-8) cm/s). Nafion was the most permeable membrane to oxygen (k(O) = 1.3 x 10(-4) cm/s), and the UF-3K membrane was the most permeable to acetate (k(A) = 7.2 x 10(-8) cm/s). Only a small percent of substrate was unaccounted for based on measured Coulombic efficiencies and estimates of biomass production and substrate losses using Nafion, CEM, and AEM membranes (4-8%), while a substantial portion of substrate was lost to unidentified processes for the UF membranes (40-89%). These results show that many types of membranes can be used in two-chambered MFCs, even membranes that transfer negatively charged species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17328216     DOI: 10.1021/es062202m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  28 in total

1.  Influence of external resistance on electrogenesis, methanogenesis, and anode prokaryotic communities in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Sokhee Jung; John M Regan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Simultaneous wastewater treatment and bioelectricity production in microbial fuel cells using cross-linked chitosan-graphene oxide mixed-matrix membranes.

Authors:  Shima L Holder; Ching-Hwa Lee; Srinivasa R Popuri
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Comparison of electrode reduction activities of Geobacter sulfurreducens and an enriched consortium in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Shun'ichi Ishii; Kazuya Watanabe; Soichi Yabuki; Bruce E Logan; Yuji Sekiguchi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Promoting the anode performance of microbial fuel cells with nano-molybdenum disulfide/carbon nanotubes composite catalyst.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Xiangrong Li; Liang Cui; Yufei Li; Hui Zhang; Tianjun Ni
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Sustainable and efficient biohydrogen production via electrohydrogenesis.

Authors:  Shaoan Cheng; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Thionine increases electricity generation from microbial fuel cell using Saccharomyces cerevisiae and exoelectrogenic mixed culture.

Authors:  Mostafa Rahimnejad; Ghasem Darzi Najafpour; Ali Asghar Ghoreyshi; Farid Talebnia; Giuliano C Premier; Gholamreza Bakeri; Jung Rae Kim; Sang-Eun Oh
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 3.422

7.  The presence of hydrogenotrophic methanogens in the inoculum improves methane gas production in microbial electrolysis cells.

Authors:  Michael Siegert; Xiu-Fen Li; Matthew D Yates; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Competitive advantage of oxygen-tolerant bioanodes of Geobacter sulfurreducens in bioelectrochemical systems.

Authors:  Allison M Speers; Gemma Reguera
Journal:  Biofilm       Date:  2021-06-14

9.  An Evaluation of the Performance and Economics of Membranes and Separators in Single Chamber Microbial Fuel Cells Treating Domestic Wastewater.

Authors:  Beate Christgen; Keith Scott; Jan Dolfing; Ian M Head; Thomas P Curtis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Nitrogen removal from wastewater through microbial electrolysis cells and cation exchange membrane.

Authors:  Sakineh Haddadi; Gholamreza Nabi-Bidhendi; Nasser Mehrdadi
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2014-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.