| Literature DB >> 17327929 |
Eiji Osaka1, Takashi Suzuki, Shunzo Osaka, Yukihiro Yoshida, Hideyuki Sugita, Satoru Asami, Keiichi Tabata, Akihiro Hemmi, Masahiko Sugitani, Norimichi Nemoto, Junnosuke Ryu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Survivin is one of the apoptosis inhibitor genes and is rarely expressed in adult -tissues. However, survivin expression has been detected in various human cancers and -correlations have been recognized between the level of expression of this gene in tumors and prognosis. In this study, we investigated the correlations between survivin mRNA expression in osteosarcoma tissues and clinicopathological parameters.Entities:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17327929 PMCID: PMC1790971 DOI: 10.1267/ahc.06005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Histochem Cytochem ISSN: 0044-5991 Impact factor: 1.938
Patient information (1992 to 2000)
| Case | Age (yr) | Sex | Site | Stage | Histology | Chemotherapy | Metastasis | Follow-up (months) | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | F | Lt. Femur | IIB | Osteoblastic | + | − | 106 | CDF |
| 2 | 22 | M | Lt. Humerus | IIB | Osteoblastic | + | − | 72 | CDF |
| 3 | 9 | M | Rt. Tibia | IIB | Osteoblastic | + | − | 61 | CDF |
| 4 | 27 | M | Lt. Tibia | IIB | Osteoblastic | + | + | 38 | DOD |
| 5 | 20 | M | Rt. 5th Rib | IIB | Osteoblastic | + | + | 25 | DOD |
| 6 | 55 | F | 2, 3rd Lumbar | IIB | Osteoblastic | − | + | 35 | DOD |
| 7 | 16 | F | Rt. Tibia | IIB | Chondroblastic | + | − | 79 | CDF |
| 8 | 12 | M | Lt. Femur | IIB | Chondroblastic | + | − | 64 | CDF |
| 9 | 20 | M | Lt. Fibula | IIB | Chondroblastic | + | + | 160 | NED |
| 10 | 62 | F | Lt. Femur | IIB | Chondroblastic | + | − | 73 | CDF |
| 11 | 13 | M | Lt. Femur | IIB | Fibroblastic | + | + | 55 | DOD |
| 12 | 10 | M | Lt. Tibia | IIB | Fibroblastic | + | − | 75 | CDF |
| 13 | 13 | F | Rt. Femur | IIB | Fibroblastic | + | − | 79 | CDF |
| 14 | 41 | F | Lt. Pelvis | IIB | Fibroblastic | + | / | 2 | DOO |
| 15 | 34 | M | Lt. Tibia | IIB | Osteoblastic | + | − | 153 | CDF |
| 16 | 17 | M | Lt. Humerus | IIB | Osteoblastic | + | / | 6 | DOO |
| 17 | 12 | F | Rt. Femur | IIB | Osteoblastic | + | + | 21 | DOD |
| 18 | 13 | M | Rt. Talus | IIB | Osteoblastic | + | + | 57 | DOD |
| 19 | 8 | M | Lt. Femur | IIB | Osteoblastic | + | + | 25 | DOD |
| 20 | 54 | F | Rt. Femur | IIB | Osteoblastic | + | + | 15 | DOD |
| 21 | 13 | M | Lt. Femur | IIIB | Osteoblastic | + | + | 44 | DOD |
| 22 | 60 | M | 3rd Lumbar | IIIB | Osteoblastic | + | + | 62 | DOD |
CDF, continuous disease free; NED, no evidence of disease; DOD, dead of disease; DOO, dead of other disease;
*: , intraoperative death;
**: , death due to a side effect of chemotherapy postoperatively.
Fig. 1Survivin mRNA expressions in normal tissues (bone, fat and muscle) and the osteosarcoma cell line NOS-1.
Fig. 2Survivin mRNA expressions in osteosarcoma samples. Figure shows initial biopsy samples. The numbers below correspond to case numbers.
Levels of survivin mRNA expression
| Case | Survivin/GAPDH |
|---|---|
| 1 | 0.66 |
| 2 | 0.73 |
| 3 | 0.77 |
| 4 | 1.12 |
| 5 | 0.91 |
| 6 | 0.93 |
| 7 | 0.73 |
| 8 | 0.64 |
| 9 | 0.66 |
| 10 | 0.56 |
| 11 | 1.34 |
| 12 | 0.75 |
| 13 | 0.6 |
| 14 | 0.69 |
| 15 | 0.51 |
| 16 | 1.03 |
| 17 | 1.4 |
| 18 | 1.14 |
| 19 | 0.95 |
| 20 | 0.81 |
| 21 | 0.69 |
| 22 | 0.54 |
Comparison of survivin mRNA levels according to clinicopathological parameters
| Variables | No. of patients | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| Stage | ||
| IIB vs IIIB | 20 vs 2 | 0.17 |
| Histological type | ||
| osteoblastic vs chondroblastic vs fibroblastic type | 14 vs 4 vs 4 | 0.18 |
| Metastasis | ||
| Meta vs Non-meta | 11 vs 9 | <0.01 |
| Age | ||
| ≤20 years vs >20 years | 14 vs 8 | 0.24 |
| Sex | ||
| Male vs Female | 14 vs 8 | 0.62 |
| Tumor development area | ||
| upper extremity vs lower extremity vs others | 2 vs 14 vs 6 | 0.58 |
| 5 year survival | ||
| alive vs dead | 11 vs 9 | <0.01 |
Differences were analyzed using either the Mann-Whitney U test or the Kruskal-Wallis test. Probability values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Fig. 3Prognostic values of survivin mRNA expressions; survivin in initial biopsy samples (excluding DOO in 2 patients).