PURPOSE: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a devastating brain tumor with a median survival of 6 months after recurrence. Cintredekin besudotox (CB) is a recombinant protein consisting of interleukin-13 (IL-13) and a truncated form of Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE38QQR). Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a locoregional-administration method leading to high-tissue concentrations with large volume of distributions. We assessed the use of intracerebral CED to deliver CB in patients with recurrent malignant glioma (MG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three phase I clinical studies evaluated intracerebral CED of CB along with tumor resection. The main objectives were to assess the tolerability of various concentrations and infusion durations; tissue distribution; and methods for optimizing delivery. All patients underwent tumor resection followed by a single intraparenchymal infusion (in addition to the intraparenchymal one following resection), with a portion of patients who had a preresection intratumoral infusion. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients with MG were treated including 46 patients with GBM. The maximum tolerated intraparenchymal concentration was 0.5 microg/mL and tumor necrosis was observed at this concentration. Infusion durations of up to 6 days were well tolerated. Postoperative catheter placement appears to be important for optimal drug distribution. CB- and procedure-related adverse events were primarily limited to the CNS. Overall median survival for GBM patients is 42.7 weeks and 55.6 weeks for patients with optimally positioned catheters with patient follow-up extending beyond 5 years. CONCLUSION: CB appears to have a favorable risk-benefit profile. CED is a complex delivery method requiring catheter placement via a second procedure to achieve accurate catheter positioning, better drug distribution, and better outcome.
PURPOSE:Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a devastating brain tumor with a median survival of 6 months after recurrence. Cintredekin besudotox (CB) is a recombinant protein consisting of interleukin-13 (IL-13) and a truncated form of Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE38QQR). Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a locoregional-administration method leading to high-tissue concentrations with large volume of distributions. We assessed the use of intracerebral CED to deliver CB in patients with recurrent malignant glioma (MG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three phase I clinical studies evaluated intracerebral CED of CB along with tumor resection. The main objectives were to assess the tolerability of various concentrations and infusion durations; tissue distribution; and methods for optimizing delivery. All patients underwent tumor resection followed by a single intraparenchymal infusion (in addition to the intraparenchymal one following resection), with a portion of patients who had a preresection intratumoral infusion. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients with MG were treated including 46 patients with GBM. The maximum tolerated intraparenchymal concentration was 0.5 microg/mL and tumor necrosis was observed at this concentration. Infusion durations of up to 6 days were well tolerated. Postoperative catheter placement appears to be important for optimal drug distribution. CB- and procedure-related adverse events were primarily limited to the CNS. Overall median survival for GBM patients is 42.7 weeks and 55.6 weeks for patients with optimally positioned catheters with patient follow-up extending beyond 5 years. CONCLUSION: CB appears to have a favorable risk-benefit profile. CED is a complex delivery method requiring catheter placement via a second procedure to achieve accurate catheter positioning, better drug distribution, and better outcome.
Authors: Gautam U Mehta; John D Heiss; John K Park; Ashok R Asthagiri; Kareem A Zaghloul; Russell R Lonser Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Neal Luther; Nai-Kong Cheung; Eleni P Souliopoulos; Ioannis Karampelas; Ioannis Karempelas; Daniel Bassiri; Mark A Edgar; Hong-Fen Guo; Ira Pastan; Philip H Gutin; Mark M Souweidane Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Costas G Hadjipanayis; Revaz Machaidze; Milota Kaluzova; Liya Wang; Albert J Schuette; Hongwei Chen; Xinying Wu; Hui Mao Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Maria G Castro; Marianela Candolfi; Thomas J Wilson; Alexandra Calinescu; Christopher Paran; Neha Kamran; Carl Koschmann; Mariela A Moreno-Ayala; Hikmat Assi; Pedro R Lowenstein Journal: Expert Opin Biol Ther Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 4.388
Authors: Randy S D'Amico; Justin A Neira; Jonathan Yun; Nikita G Alexiades; Matei Banu; Zachary K Englander; Benjamin C Kennedy; Timothy H Ung; Robert J Rothrock; Alexander Romanov; Xiaotao Guo; Binsheng Zhao; Adam M Sonabend; Peter Canoll; Jeffrey N Bruce Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 5.115