Literature DB >> 17327319

Perceptions of psychosocial factors and the insulin pump.

Marilyn D Ritholz1, Arlene Smaldone, Jarim Lee, Astrid Castillo, Howard Wolpert, Katie Weinger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify psychosocial issues related to diabetes, approaches to self-care, self-perceptions, and social interactions among insulin pump users with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Adult insulin pump users participated in focus groups loosely formed on the basis of A1C level. Transcripts of focus group meetings were coded into themes by five reviewers using NVivo2 qualitative software.
RESULTS: Thirty adults with long-term diabetes participated in five focus groups: two with low mean +/-SD A1C (6.8 +/- 0.4%), one with mid A1C (7.80 +/- 0.3%), and two with high A1C (9.1 +/- 0.5%). Three major themes were identified: impact on diabetes self-care, emotional reactions to the insulin pump, body image, and social acceptance. Participants who described the pump as a tool to meet glycemic goals also described a more active approach to diabetes and had better glycemic control; those who discussed the pump as a panacea described more passive self-care and had poorer glycemic control. Low A1C groups reported that starting the insulin pump reminded them of feelings they experienced at their initial diabetes diagnosis, whereas the high A1C groups did not report these feelings. Women were more concerned than men about body image and social acceptance with pump use.
CONCLUSIONS: Active participation in self-care, realistic expectations of pump use, and emotional recall of diabetes diagnosis were associated with better glycemic control. Interventions to improve diabetes management with pump use should include evaluation and discussion of active versus passive approaches to self-care, recall of diabetes diagnosis, expectations of the pump, and pump-related self-consciousness and body image concerns. The roles of these factors in optimal diabetes management warrant further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17327319     DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  27 in total

Review 1.  Digging deeper: the role of qualitative research in behavioral diabetes.

Authors:  Marilyn D Ritholz; Elizabeth A Beverly; Katie Weinger
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Identifying Differences in Risk Factors for Depression and Anxiety in Pediatric Chronic Disease: A Matched Cross-Sectional Study of Youth with Lupus/Mixed Connective Tissue Disease and Their Peers with Diabetes.

Authors:  Andrea Knight; Pamela Weiss; Knashawn Morales; Marsha Gerdes; Melissa Rearson; Michelle Vickery; Ron Keren
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Experiences of Adults Using Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Naglaa Ibrahim Mesbah; Nehad Abd-El-Raheem Taha; Zahra Nema Rahme; Faten Fawzi Sukkar; Dina Mohamed Omar
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Accuracy of a new patch pump based on a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) compared to other commercially available insulin pumps: results of the first in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Sophie Borot; Sylvia Franc; Justine Cristante; Alfred Penfornis; Pierre-Yves Benhamou; Bruno Guerci; Hélène Hanaire; Eric Renard; Yves Reznik; Chantal Simon; Guillaume Charpentier
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-07-30

5.  The Impact of Externally Worn Diabetes Technology on Sexual Behavior and Activity, Body Image, and Anxiety in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Courtney Robertson; Ashleigh Lin; Grant Smith; Anna Yeung; Penelope Strauss; Jennifer Nicholas; Elizabeth Davis; Tim Jones; Lisa Gibson; Juliet Richters; Martin de Bock
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-23

6.  Patient Perceptions and Preferences for a Mealtime Insulin Delivery Patch.

Authors:  Mark Peyrot; Darlene Dreon; Vivien Zraick; Brett Cross; Meng H Tan
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 7.  Quality of life and technology: impact on children and families with diabetes.

Authors:  Masakazu Hirose; Elizabeth A Beverly; Katie Weinger
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 8.  Influences on Technology Use and Efficacy in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Victoria Franklin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-03

Review 9.  Psychological insulin resistance: patient beliefs and implications for diabetes management.

Authors:  Meryl Brod; Jens Harald Kongsø; Suzanne Lessard; Torsten L Christensen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Patient Perspectives on Quality of Life With Uncontrolled Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Alex Rewegan; Francesca Brundisini; Deirdre Dejean; Mita Giacomini
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.