Literature DB >> 17326354

Outcomes of ZB5M angle-supported anterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses at 12 years.

Jaime Javaloy1, Jorge L Alió, Maria T Iradier, Ayman M Abdelrahman, Tomas Javaloy, Fernando Borrás.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive stability and the potential long-term risks associated with ZB5M phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation.
METHODS: A retrospective, non-randomized, cumulative clinical study was performed over 12 years in a consecutive group of 225 eyes implanted with the ZB5M PIOL. The main analyzed variables were visual and refractive outcomes (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity [BSCVA], uncorrected visual acuity [UCVA], and spherical equivalent), endothelial cell density, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -17.23 +/- 7.69 diopters (D) and 12 years postoperatively it was -1.80 +/- 0.80 D. Mean BSCVA at 1- and 12-year follow-up was 0.38 +/- 0.19 and 0.57 +/- 0.18, respectively (Wilcoxon test, P < .001). At 12 years postoperatively, 3.5% of eyes lost > or = 2 lines of BSCVA. An initial 10.6% reduction in endothelial cell density was noted in the first year, followed by a mean annual rate of decrease of 1.78%. The cumulative incidence of pupil ovalization was 34.7% (78 eyes), and there was no statistical correlation with endothelial cell impairment. Bilateral hypertensive uveitis was diagnosed in 3 (1.33%) eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: The ZB5M PIOL offers good refractive outcomes and stability in the long-term; however, endothelial cell loss increases over 12 years, requiring annual endothelial cell counts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17326354     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070201-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  8 in total

1.  AcrySof phakic angle-supported intraocular lens for the correction of high to extremely high myopia: one-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Rui-Bo Yang; Shao-Zhen Zhao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  The posterior chamber phakic refractive lens (PRL): a review.

Authors:  R J Pérez-Cambrodí; D P Piñero; T Ferrer-Blasco; A Cerviño; R Brautaset
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  [Phakic intraocular lenses].

Authors:  T Kohnen; M Shajari
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Correlation of anterior chamber angle and ciliary sulcus diameters with white-to-white corneal diameter in high myopes using artemis VHF digital ultrasound.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Ronald H Silverman; Mark J Rondeau; D Jackson Coleman
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Simultaneous bilensectomy and endothelial keratoplasty for angle-supported phakic intraocular lens-induced corneal decompensation.

Authors:  Vikas Mittal; Ruchi Mittal; Daljit Singh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Long-Term Comparison of Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens With and Without a Central Hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) Implantation for Moderate to High Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: Consort-Compliant Article.

Authors:  Kimiya Shimizu; Kazutaka Kamiya; Akihito Igarashi; Hidenaga Kobashi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Case Report: Dislocation Into Vitreous Cavity and Removal of a Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Jingliang He; Li Zhang; Fang Zheng; Xiaoyun Fang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-28

8.  Stability of cachet phakic intraocular lens position during 6-months follow-up.

Authors:  D Schiano Lomoriello; M Lombardo; L Gualdi; L Iacobelli; L Tranchina; P Ducoli; S Serrao
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2013-03-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.