Literature DB >> 17325416

Threshold suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation current resulting in retinal damage in rabbits.

Kazuaki Nakauchi1, Takashi Fujikado, Hiroyuki Kanda, Shunji Kusaka, Motoki Ozawa, Hirokazu Sakaguchi, Yasushi Ikuno, Motohiro Kamei, Yasuo Tano.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the threshold suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation (STS) current that results in retinal damage in rabbits. Biphasic STS pulses (anodic first, frequency 20 Hz) were used to stimulate the retina of pigmented rabbits (n = 18) continuously for 1 h using a 100 microm diameter platinum wire electrode. The STS current that induced retinal damage after 1 h was determined by ophthalmoscopy or by fluorescein angiography (FA) independently. The effect of the pulse duration on the threshold current was investigated. Histological studies were performed after electrical stimulation experiments. The threshold for a safe current to the retina was 0.6 mA for a duration of 0.5 ms. The threshold for a safe charge increased approximately linearly with an increase of stimulus duration but the threshold for a safe current decreased logarithmically with an increase of duration. The threshold for a safe electrical energy remained almost constant for all durations. Histological examination showed severe retinal damage when the current exceeded the threshold, with more damage in the inner layers compared with the outer layers of the retina. The threshold for the safe current was higher than that reported for direct stimulation of neural tissues, suggesting that the STS method was safe and able to be used with a retinal prosthesis. Because the threshold for the safe charge was lower with shorter pulse durations, care should be taken using pulses of short durations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17325416     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/4/1/S07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  10 in total

Review 1.  A review of in vivo animal studies in retinal prosthesis research.

Authors:  Dimiter R Bertschinger; Evgueny Beknazar; Manuel Simonutti; Avinoam B Safran; José A Sahel; Serge G Rosolen; Serge Picaud; Joel Salzmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Channelrhodopsins provide a breakthrough insight into strategies for curing blindness.

Authors:  Hiroshi Tomita; Eriko Sugano; Hitomi Isago; Makoto Tamai
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  In vivo and in vitro study of suprachoroidal fibrin glue.

Authors:  Jing Hou; Yong Tao; Yan-Rong Jiang; Kai Wang
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Evaluation of electrochemically treated bulk electrodes for a retinal prosthesis by examination of retinal intrinsic signals in cats.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kanda; Toshifumi Mihashi; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Yoko Hirohara; Takeshi Morimoto; Yasuo Terasawa; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Are long stimulus pulse durations the answer to improving spatial resolution in retinal prostheses?

Authors:  Matthew A Petoe; Mohit N Shivdasani
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-11

Review 6.  Role of electrical activity in promoting neural repair.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Goldberg
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Spatial characteristics of evoked potentials elicited by a MEMS microelectrode array for suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation in a rabbit.

Authors:  Yan Yan; Xiaohong Sui; Wenjia Liu; Yiliang Lu; Pengjia Cao; Zengguang Ma; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Immunocytochemical analysis of retinal neurons under electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Aditi Ray; Leonardo Colodetti; James D Weiland; David R Hinton; Mark S Humayun; Eun-Jin Lee
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Techniques for processing eyes implanted with a retinal prosthesis for localized histopathological analysis.

Authors:  David A X Nayagam; Ceara McGowan; Joel Villalobos; Richard A Williams; Cesar Salinas-LaRosa; Penny McKelvie; Irene Lo; Meri Basa; Justin Tan; Chris E Williams
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 10.  Implantable Direct Current Neural Modulation: Theory, Feasibility, and Efficacy.

Authors:  Felix P Aplin; Gene Y Fridman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.