PURPOSE: Many corneal grafts undergo immune rejection, and current therapies are associated with many side effects. The purpose of this study was to identify critical chemokine pathways involved in generating the alloimmune response to corneal transplants. METHODS: Orthotopic corneal transplantation was performed in fully mismatched strains. Cytokine and chemokine receptor gene expression was determined by the RNase protection assay. Knockout (KO) strains for chemokine-chemokine receptors that are upregulated after transplantation underwent corneal transplantation. Results derived from KO murine hosts were compared with cyclosporine (Cy) therapy. In addition to graft survival, graft infiltration, allospecific delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH), and cytokine expression were compared among the recipient groups. RESULTS: Initial experiments revealed gene upregulation of the chemokine receptors CCR1, -2, and -5 after corneal allorejection. Although CCR1 KO hosts showed a significant increase in graft survival compared with wild-type (WT) hosts, allografts in CCR5, CCR2/CCL3(MIP-1alpha), CXCR3, CXCL10/IP-10, and CCL3/MIP-1alpha KO mice did not show a significant improvement in graft survival. Further, CCR1 KO hosts showed a significantly higher survival rate than with systemic Cy therapy in WT hosts. Moreover, graft infiltration by leukocytes and gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines were reduced in CCR1 KO mice compared with both Cy treated and untreated WT mice, as was the induction of allospecific DTH. CONCLUSIONS: These studies provide, for the first time, evidence that targeting of specific chemokine pathways can significantly promote survival of corneal transplants, and suggest that select deletion or suppression of CCR1 can be a useful therapeutic target in corneal transplant immunity.
PURPOSE: Many corneal grafts undergo immune rejection, and current therapies are associated with many side effects. The purpose of this study was to identify critical chemokine pathways involved in generating the alloimmune response to corneal transplants. METHODS: Orthotopic corneal transplantation was performed in fully mismatched strains. Cytokine and chemokine receptor gene expression was determined by the RNase protection assay. Knockout (KO) strains for chemokine-chemokine receptors that are upregulated after transplantation underwent corneal transplantation. Results derived from KO murine hosts were compared with cyclosporine (Cy) therapy. In addition to graft survival, graft infiltration, allospecific delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH), and cytokine expression were compared among the recipient groups. RESULTS: Initial experiments revealed gene upregulation of the chemokine receptors CCR1, -2, and -5 after corneal allorejection. Although CCR1 KO hosts showed a significant increase in graft survival compared with wild-type (WT) hosts, allografts in CCR5, CCR2/CCL3(MIP-1alpha), CXCR3, CXCL10/IP-10, and CCL3/MIP-1alpha KO mice did not show a significant improvement in graft survival. Further, CCR1 KO hosts showed a significantly higher survival rate than with systemic Cy therapy in WT hosts. Moreover, graft infiltration by leukocytes and gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines were reduced in CCR1 KO mice compared with both Cy treated and untreated WT mice, as was the induction of allospecific DTH. CONCLUSIONS: These studies provide, for the first time, evidence that targeting of specific chemokine pathways can significantly promote survival of corneal transplants, and suggest that select deletion or suppression of CCR1 can be a useful therapeutic target in corneal transplant immunity.
Authors: P M Murphy; M Baggiolini; I F Charo; C A Hébert; R Horuk; K Matsushima; L H Miller; J J Oppenheim; C A Power Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 25.468
Authors: W Gao; P S Topham; J A King; S T Smiley; V Csizmadia; B Lu; C J Gerard; W W Hancock Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: L A Robinson; C Nataraj; D W Thomas; D N Howell; R Griffiths; V Bautch; D D Patel; L Feng; T M Coffman Journal: J Immunol Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: W W Hancock; B Lu; W Gao; V Csizmadia; K Faia; J A King; S T Smiley; M Ling; N P Gerard; C Gerard Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2000-11-20 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Christine von Toerne; Jacob Menzler; Alice Ly; Nicole Senninger; Marius Ueffing; Stefanie M Hauck Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Shilpa Kodati; Sunil K Chauhan; Yihe Chen; Thomas H Dohlman; Parisa Karimian; Daniel Saban; Reza Dana Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Marjan Farid; Anshu Agrawal; Daniel Fremgen; Jeremiah Tao; He Chuyi; Anthony B Nesburn; Lbachir BenMohamed Journal: Ocul Immunol Inflamm Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 3.070
Authors: Pedram Hamrah; Zdenka Haskova; Andrew W Taylor; Qiang Zhang; Bruce R Ksander; M Reza Dana Journal: Transplantation Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 4.939