PURPOSE: To describe the distribution of retinal vascular calibers and their associations with ethnicity, gender, and birth parameters in children. METHODS: This was a school-based cross-sectional study of 768 children aged 7 to 9 years who participated in the Singapore Cohort Study of the Risk Factors for Myopia (SCORM). Participants had retinal photographs taken in 2001. Retinal vascular calibers were measured with computer-based program and summarized as average caliber of arterioles and venules in that eye. Associations of retinal vascular caliber with ethnicity, gender, and various birth factors were analyzed. RESULTS: In this population, the mean retinal arteriolar caliber was 156.4 microm (95% confidence interval [CI], 155.4-157.3) and venular caliber was 225.4 microm (95% CI, 224.1-226.8). The retinal arteriolar caliber was significantly narrower in Chinese (154.9 microm), compared with Malay (158.6 microm) and Indian (158.5 microm) children. Retinal venular caliber was also narrower in Chinese (223.3 microm) compared with Malay (230.8 microm) and Indian (229.0 microm) children. These differences were statistically significant, even after adjustments for age, gender, family income, parental education, body mass index, height, birth weight, axial length, and spherical equivalent (P = 0.05 for arteriolar caliber; P = 0.002 for venular caliber). In multivariate analysis, there were no significant gender differences in retinal vascular caliber. Birth factors, including birth weight, birth length, head circumference, and gestational age, were not significantly associated with changes in either retinal arteriolar or venular caliber. CONCLUSIONS: The results show ethnic variation in retinal vascular caliber in Singaporean children. No association of birth parameters with retinal vascular caliber was found. Because retinal vascular caliber is related to various cardiovascular and ocular diseases, it is possible that ethnic variations in retinal vascular caliber should be taken into consideration in future studies.
PURPOSE: To describe the distribution of retinal vascular calibers and their associations with ethnicity, gender, and birth parameters in children. METHODS: This was a school-based cross-sectional study of 768 children aged 7 to 9 years who participated in the Singapore Cohort Study of the Risk Factors for Myopia (SCORM). Participants had retinal photographs taken in 2001. Retinal vascular calibers were measured with computer-based program and summarized as average caliber of arterioles and venules in that eye. Associations of retinal vascular caliber with ethnicity, gender, and various birth factors were analyzed. RESULTS: In this population, the mean retinal arteriolar caliber was 156.4 microm (95% confidence interval [CI], 155.4-157.3) and venular caliber was 225.4 microm (95% CI, 224.1-226.8). The retinal arteriolar caliber was significantly narrower in Chinese (154.9 microm), compared with Malay (158.6 microm) and Indian (158.5 microm) children. Retinal venular caliber was also narrower in Chinese (223.3 microm) compared with Malay (230.8 microm) and Indian (229.0 microm) children. These differences were statistically significant, even after adjustments for age, gender, family income, parental education, body mass index, height, birth weight, axial length, and spherical equivalent (P = 0.05 for arteriolar caliber; P = 0.002 for venular caliber). In multivariate analysis, there were no significant gender differences in retinal vascular caliber. Birth factors, including birth weight, birth length, head circumference, and gestational age, were not significantly associated with changes in either retinal arteriolar or venular caliber. CONCLUSIONS: The results show ethnic variation in retinal vascular caliber in Singaporean children. No association of birth parameters with retinal vascular caliber was found. Because retinal vascular caliber is related to various cardiovascular and ocular diseases, it is possible that ethnic variations in retinal vascular caliber should be taken into consideration in future studies.
Authors: Alexander Pinhas; Moataz Razeen; Michael Dubow; Alexander Gan; Toco Y Chui; Nishit Shah; Mitul Mehta; Ronald C Gentile; Rishard Weitz; Joseph B Walsh; Yusufu N Sulai; Joseph Carroll; Alfredo Dubra; Richard B Rosen Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ronald M Hansen; Susan E Eklund; Ilan Y Benador; Julie A Mocko; James D Akula; Yao Liu; M Elena Martinez-Perez; Anne B Fulton Journal: Vision Res Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 1.886
Authors: Alun D Hughes; Raj Bathula; Chloe Park; Therese Tillin; Nicholas Wit; Simon McG Thom; Nish Chaturvedi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ning Cheung; Kim C Donaghue; Gerald Liew; Sophie L Rogers; Jie Jin Wang; Shueh-Wen Lim; Alicia J Jenkins; Wynne Hsu; Mong Li Lee; Tien Y Wong Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-10-03 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Ning Cheung; Sophie L Rogers; Kim C Donaghue; Alicia J Jenkins; Gabriella Tikellis; Tien Yin Wong Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-06-03 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Sarah P M Hosking; Rani Bhatia; Patricia A Crock; Ian Wright; Marline L Squance; Glenn Reeves Journal: BMC Endocr Disord Date: 2013-10-05 Impact factor: 2.763
Authors: Ian J C MacCormick; Nicholas A V Beare; Terrie E Taylor; Valentina Barrera; Valerie A White; Paul Hiscott; Malcolm E Molyneux; Baljean Dhillon; Simon P Harding Journal: Brain Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 13.501