Literature DB >> 17324491

Prioritising patients on surgical waiting lists: a conjoint analysis study on the priority judgements of patients, surgeons, occupational physicians, and general practitioners.

Jurriaan P Oudhoff1, D R M Timmermans, D L Knol, A B Bijnen, G Van der Wal.   

Abstract

The prioritisation of patients on waiting lists is ascribed high potential for diminishing the consequences of waiting times for elective surgery. However, consistent evidence is lacking about which factors determine patient priority and it is unclear whether different stakeholders have different opinions on this issue. This study, conducted in the Netherlands, investigates the judgements of patients, laypersons (i.e. patients on other waiting lists), and physicians on the priority of patients on waiting lists. Participants were former patients with varicose veins (N=82), inguinal hernia (N=86), and gallstones (N=89), 101 surgeons, 95 occupational physicians, and 65 general practitioners. Each participant judged the priority of paper vignettes of patients with varicose veins, inguinal hernia, and gallstones. The vignettes were designed according to conjoint analysis methodology and described the physical symptoms, the psychological distress, the social limitations, and impairments in work of patients. Multilevel regression analysis of the responses showed that all groups made significant distinctions in patient priority depending on the severity of each characteristic in the vignettes. The physical symptoms and impairments in work had on average the highest impact on priority, but the summed impact of non-physical factors exceeded that of the physical symptoms. The different groups of participants appraised only the importance of the physical symptoms differently, but opinions on priority varied widely within each group. Whereas the high level of agreement between the different groups would facilitate the acceptance and the implementation of explicit prioritisation of patients on the waiting list, the high inter-individual variation signifies that consensus criteria for prioritisation are needed to warrant equity and transparency in care provision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17324491     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  10 in total

1.  English NHS waiting times: what next?

Authors:  Anthony J Harrison; John Appleby
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Patient-reported outcomes and surgical triage: A gap in patient-centered care?

Authors:  R Trafford Crump; Guiping Liu; Mark Chase; Jason M Sutherland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  TOWARDS PATIENT-CENTERED CARE FOR DEPRESSION: CONJOINT METHODS TO TAILOR TREATMENT BASED ON PREFERENCES.

Authors:  Marsha N Wittink; Mark Cary; Thomas Tenhave; Jonathan Baron; Joseph J Gallo
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  Identifying and Understanding the Non-Clinical Impacts of Delayed or Cancelled Surgery in Order to Inform Prioritisation Processes: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kathryn Jack; Catrin Evans; Louise Bramley; Joanne Cooper; Tracy Keane; Marie Cope; Elizabeth Hendron
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Activities of occupational physicians for occupational health services in small-scale enterprises in Japan and in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Jiro Moriguchi; Masayuki Ikeda; Sonoko Sakuragi; Kazuo Takeda; Takashi Muto; Toshiaki Higashi; André N H Weel; Frank J van Dijk
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Modeling the information preferences of parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Don H Buchanan; Michelle Gold; Katherine Sdao-Jarvie; Michael Boyle
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2008-05-15

Review 7.  Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Jordan J Louviere; David A Chambers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Prioritisation of patients on waiting lists for hip and knee arthroplasties and cataract surgery: Instruments validation.

Authors:  Alejandro Allepuz; Mireia Espallargues; Montse Moharra; Mercè Comas; Joan M V Pons
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Factors determining the patients' care intensity for surgeons and surgical nurses: a conjoint analysis.

Authors:  Catharina J van Oostveen; Hester Vermeulen; Els J M Nieveen van Dijkum; Dirk J Gouma; Dirk T Ubbink
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Referral Prioritization in Home Care Occupational Therapy: A Matter of Perspective.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Raymond; Debbie Ehrmann Feldman; Louise Demers
Journal:  Can J Occup Ther       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 1.614

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.