OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the feasibility and effects of patient-clinician shared decision-making (SDM) for depression treatment. Within a goal of informing the design of a SDM intervention, the objective of this study was to investigate depressed patients' perceptions of the treatment decision-making process with general practitioners (GPs). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were gathered from a convenience sample of 40 depressed patients to understand key aspects of treatment decision-making from the patient perspective. The sample varied in depression severity and type of setting in which treatment was sought. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Semi-structured interview questions focused on patients' prior experiences with depression and treatment, perceptions of the treatment decision-making process, and needs and expectations about treatment. Current depression severity was also assessed. RESULTS: Patient lack of insight regarding depression severity substantially delayed patient engagement in treatment seeking and decision-making. Patients expected their GPs to be a first and main source of objective information and discussion about depression and treatment and to provide emotional support for decision-making. Patients also identified needs for additional information about depression and its treatment, as well as concerns about certain aspects of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The depression treatment context has some aspects that differ from treatment decision-making for other types of health conditions. SDM approaches for depression treatment should be adapted based on depression severity and patient-identified needs.
OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the feasibility and effects of patient-clinician shared decision-making (SDM) for depression treatment. Within a goal of informing the design of a SDM intervention, the objective of this study was to investigate depressedpatients' perceptions of the treatment decision-making process with general practitioners (GPs). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were gathered from a convenience sample of 40 depressedpatients to understand key aspects of treatment decision-making from the patient perspective. The sample varied in depression severity and type of setting in which treatment was sought. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Semi-structured interview questions focused on patients' prior experiences with depression and treatment, perceptions of the treatment decision-making process, and needs and expectations about treatment. Current depression severity was also assessed. RESULTS:Patient lack of insight regarding depression severity substantially delayed patient engagement in treatment seeking and decision-making. Patients expected their GPs to be a first and main source of objective information and discussion about depression and treatment and to provide emotional support for decision-making. Patients also identified needs for additional information about depression and its treatment, as well as concerns about certain aspects of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The depression treatment context has some aspects that differ from treatment decision-making for other types of health conditions. SDM approaches for depression treatment should be adapted based on depression severity and patient-identified needs.
Authors: Sarah L Clever; Daniel E Ford; Lisa V Rubenstein; Kathryn M Rost; Lisa S Meredith; Cathy D Sherbourne; Nae-Yuh Wang; Jose J Arbelaez; Lisa A Cooper Journal: Med Care Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Benjamin W Van Voorhees; Joshua Fogel; Thomas K Houston; Lisa A Cooper; Nae-Yuh Wang; Daniel E Ford Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Ruth E Davis; Gina Dolan; Sue Thomas; Christine Atwell; Donna Mead; Sarah Nehammer; Laurie Moseley; Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn Journal: Health Expect Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Lisa Tlach; Caroline Wüsten; Anne Daubmann; Sarah Liebherz; Martin Härter; Jörg Dirmaier Journal: Health Expect Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Patrick J Raue; Herbert C Schulberg; Roberto Lewis-Fernandez; Carla Boutin-Foster; Amy S Hoffman; Martha L Bruce Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Roos A van Grieken; Anneloes C E Kirkenier; Maarten W J Koeter; Udo W Nabitz; Aart H Schene Journal: Health Expect Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 3.377