Literature DB >> 17323098

Circumferential stabilization with ghost screwing after posterior resection of spinal metastases via transpedicular route.

Alparslan Senel1, Ahmet Hilmi Kaya, Enis Kuruoglu, Fahrettin Celik.   

Abstract

Various surgical methods have been described for treating spinal metastases, namely, en bloc spondylectomy, minimally invasive techniques, and anterior and posterior approaches. The main goals in surgical intervention for these lesions are tumor removal and establishment of strong, durable stabilization. The least invasive method is always preferred. Posterior transpedicular spondylectomy meets all these needs, as this method achieves tumor excision and stabilization of the anterior and posterior spine through one posterior incision and in the same surgical session. The surgeon circumferentially excises a spinal metastasis and then achieves circumferential stabilization in the same session. Numerous circumferential stabilization methods have been used to date, including placement of free bone grafts or cages or acrylic grafts, or insertion of an acrylic graft supported by a Steinmann pin anteriorly and by posterior transpedicular fixators or a Luque rectangle posteriorly. This article describes seven cases of spinal metastasis in which an alternative circumferential stabilization technique known as "ghost screwing" was performed. The first step in this method is circumferential decompression, achieved with laminectomy followed by eggshell corpectomy via the transpedicular route. Then a short segmental transpedicular stabilization system is fixed to the vertebrae cranial and caudal to the laminectomy/corpectomy defect. Prior to fixing the rods in place, an additional screw is mounted on each rod such that the screw shaft protrudes into the defect space. Once the rods are fixed and the two extra screws are optimally positioned, acrylic bone cement is introduced into the defect site, encasing the ghost screws and forming an anterior graft upon hardening. The outcomes in our cases were excellent. All seven patients had uneventful postoperative periods and all experienced pain relief and were able to mobilize early. Direct connection of the anterior acrylic graft to the posterior fixation system via ghost screws makes this system strong and durable, and prevents subsidence or horizontal displacement of the graft. Such complications can be serious issues with other circumferential systems that use independent anterior and posterior fixators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17323098     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-007-0067-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  31 in total

1.  Spinal cord decompression via a modified costotransversectomy approach combined with posterior instrumentation for management of metastatic neoplasms of the thoracic spine.

Authors:  G R Cybulski; J L Stone; O Opesanmi
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1991-04

2.  Anterior decompression and stabilization of the spine in malignant disease.

Authors:  A J Moore; D Uttley
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Noncontiguous spinal metastases and plasmocytomas should be operated on through a single posterior midline approach, and circumferential decompression should be performed with individualized reconstruction.

Authors:  M Mühlbauer; W Pfisterer; R Eyb; E Knosp
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Single-stage posterolateral transpedicle approach for spondylectomy, epidural decompression, and circumferential fusion of spinal metastases.

Authors:  M H Bilsky; P Boland; E Lis; J J Raizer; J H Healey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Single-stage posterior vertebrectomy and replacement combined with posterior instrumentation for spinal metastasis.

Authors:  E W Akeyson; I E McCutcheon
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Anterior approaches for thoracolumbar metastatic spine tumors.

Authors:  Daryl R Fourney; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 7.  Posterior surgical approaches and outcomes in metastatic spine-disease.

Authors:  Paul Klimo; Andrew T Dailey; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  Endoscopically assisted decompression for metastatic thoracic neoplasms.

Authors:  R F McLain
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Transthoracic vertebrectomy for metastatic spinal tumors.

Authors:  Z L Gokaslan; J E York; G L Walsh; I E McCutcheon; F F Lang; J B Putnam; D M Wildrick; S G Swisher; D Abi-Said; R Sawaya
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Anterior decompression and stabilization of the spine as a treatment for vertebral collapse and spinal cord compression from metastatic malignancy.

Authors:  K D Harrington
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

1.  Technical nuances and approach-related morbidity of anterolateral and posterolateral lumbar corpectomy approaches-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Christoph Wipplinger; Sara Lener; Christoph Orban; Tamara M Wipplinger; Anto Abramovic; Anna Lang; Sebastian Hartmann; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 2.816

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.