Literature DB >> 9761054

Transthoracic vertebrectomy for metastatic spinal tumors.

Z L Gokaslan1, J E York, G L Walsh, I E McCutcheon, F F Lang, J B Putnam, D M Wildrick, S G Swisher, D Abi-Said, R Sawaya.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Anterior approaches to the spine for the treatment of spinal tumors have gained acceptance; however, in most published reports, patients with primary, metastatic, or chest wall tumors involving cervical, thoracic, or lumbar regions of the spine are combined. The purpose of this study was to provide a clear perspective of results that can be expected in patients who undergo anterior vertebral body resection, reconstruction, and stabilization for spinal metastases that are limited to the thoracic region.
METHODS: Outcome is presented for 72 patients with metastatic spinal tumors who were treated by transthoracic vertebrectomy at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The predominant primary tumors included renal cancer in 19 patients, breast cancer in 10, melanoma or sarcoma in 10, and lung cancer in nine patients. The most common presenting symptoms were back pain, which occurred in 90% of patients, and lower-extremity weakness, which occurred in 64% of patients. All patients underwent transthoracic vertebrectomy, decompression, reconstruction with methylmethacrylate, and anterior fixation with locking plate and screw constructs. Supplemental posterior instrumentation was required in seven patients with disease involving the cervicothoracic or thoracolumbar junction, which was causing severe kyphosis. After surgery, pain improved in 60 of 65 patients. This improvement was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001) based on visual analog scales and narcotic analgesic medication use. Thirty-five of the 46 patients who presented with neurological dysfunction improved significantly (p < 0.001) following the procedure. Thirty-three patients had weakness but could ambulate preoperatively. Seventeen of these 33 regained normal strength, 15 patients continued to have weakness, and one patient was neurologically worse postoperatively. Of the 13 preoperatively nonambulatory patients, 10 could walk after surgery and three were still unable to walk but showed improved motor function. Twenty-one patients had complications ranging from minor atelectasis to pulmonary embolism. The 30-day mortality rate was 3%. The 1-year survival rate for the entire study population was 62%.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that transthoracic vertebrectomy and spinal stabilization can improve the quality of life considerably in cancer patients with spinal metastasis by restoring or preserving ambulation and by controlling intractable spinal pain with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9761054     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.4.0599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  66 in total

Review 1.  Image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of spine tumors.

Authors:  Yoshiya Yamada; Michael Lovelock; Mark H Bilsky
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  A meta-analysis of surgery versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic spinal epidural disease.

Authors:  Paul Klimo; Clinton J Thompson; John R W Kestle; Meic H Schmidt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Interdisciplinary clinical evaluation of 58 patients with lumbar-vertebral metastases from cervico-uterine cancer.

Authors:  Víctor Valdespino Gómez; Juan M Salgado Cazares; Gaspar González Astudillo; Víctor E Valdespino Castillo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Primary malignant bone tumors and solitary metastases of the thoracolumbar spine: results by management with total en bloc spondylectomy.

Authors:  Ingo Melcher; Alexander C Disch; Cyrus Khodadadyan-Klostermann; Stefan Tohtz; Mirko Smolny; Ulrich Stöckle; Norbert P Haas; Klaus-Dieter Schaser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Surgical management of spinal mesenchymal tumors.

Authors:  Milan G Mody; Ganesh Rao; Laurence D Rhines
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  En bloc spondylectomy reconstructions in a biomechanical in-vitro study.

Authors:  A C Disch; K D Schaser; I Melcher; A Luzzati; F Feraboli; W Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Minimally invasive versus conventional spine surgery for vertebral metastases: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Zach Pennington; A Karim Ahmed; Camilo A Molina; Jeffrey Ehresman; Ilya Laufer; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

Review 8.  Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group.

Authors:  David Choi; A Crockard; C Bunger; J Harms; N Kawahara; C Mazel; R Melcher; K Tomita
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Outcome of excisional surgeries for the patients with spinal metastases.

Authors:  Haomiao Li; Alessandro Gasbarrini; Michele Cappuccio; Silvia Terzi; Stefania Paderni; Loris Mirabile; Stefano Boriani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of metastatic spinal tumors in patients with posterior wall defects.

Authors:  Hongpu Sun; Zuozhang Yang; Yongqing Xu; Xuefeng Liu; Ya Zhang; Yanjin Chen; Da Xu; Yihao Yang; Dongqi Li; Junfeng Xia
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.