Literature DB >> 17321970

Solis cage (PEEK) for anterior cervical fusion: preliminary radiological results with emphasis on fusion and subsidence.

Arvind G Kulkarni1, Hwan T Hee, Hee K Wong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Recent literature has raised some apprehensions with regard to the usage of cervical cages.
PURPOSE: Radiological review of cases performed at our institution with a novel cage made of polyetheretherketone (PEEK). STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
METHODS: A retrospective review of the first 15 consecutive cases of single-level anterior cervical interbody fusion using the Solis cage (PEEK material) for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy or myelopathy was performed. The follow-up ranged from 12 to 35 months (average 18 months). Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken immediately after the surgery and at intervals of 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Anterior disc height (ADH), posterior disc height (PDH), interbody height ratio (IBHR), distance between the posterior margin of the cage and the posterior wall of the vertebral body (D-CPW), and interbody angle (IBA) were measured on the lateral radiographs and compared. Fusion was assessed by examining for trabecular continuity, bridging of bone across the disc space, and sclerosis at the vertebral end plates on both sides. The parameters assessed were time for fusion, subsidence, segmental sagittal alignment of the operated segment, and presence/absence of migration of the cage. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test.
RESULTS: Fusion was evident at 3-6 months postsurgery in all cases except one (93.33% fusion rate at 6 months). At the last follow-up, fusion was maintained in all cases. The immediate postoperative ADH and PDH was significantly greater than the respective preoperative values and was maintained at the last follow-up though there was a significant amount of subsidence when the follow-up radiographs were compared with the immediate postoperative X-rays. The immediate postoperative IBHR was significantly greater than the preoperative IBHR, and was maintained at the last follow-up, but not statistically significant. The immediate postoperative IBA (lordotic angle) was greater than the preoperative IBA but was not statistically significant. The IBA at the last follow-up was lesser than the preoperative value but with no statistical significance. The IBA measured at the last follow-up was less than the value at the immediate postoperative period, but not statistically significant. There was no migration or extrusion of the cage at latest follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The high fusion rate, low subsidence, stability provided by the cage, and facilitation of radiological assessment are the result of the physical properties of the PEEK material as well as the design of the cage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17321970     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  38 in total

Review 1.  Safe clinical use of carbon nanotubes as innovative biomaterials.

Authors:  Naoto Saito; Hisao Haniu; Yuki Usui; Kaoru Aoki; Kazuo Hara; Seiji Takanashi; Masayuki Shimizu; Nobuyo Narita; Masanori Okamoto; Shinsuke Kobayashi; Hiroki Nomura; Hiroyuki Kato; Naoyuki Nishimura; Seiichi Taruta; Morinobu Endo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Comparison of Radiologic Outcomes of Different Methods in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  O Ik Kwon; Dong Wuk Son; Sang Weon Lee; Geun Sung Song
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2016-09-30

3.  Plate augmentation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage for degenerative cervical spinal disorders.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Cyrus E Taghavi; Margaret S Hsu; Kwang-Bok Lee; Gyu-Hyung Kim; Ji-Hoon Song
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Efficacy of PEEK cages and plate augmentation in three-level anterior cervical fusion of elderly patients.

Authors:  Kyung Jin Song; Gyu Hyung Kim; Byeong Yeol Choi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-02-15

5.  Implantation of an empty polyetheretherketone cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomised controlled study with 2 years follow-up.

Authors:  Shang-Wen Feng; Ming-Chau Chang; Po-Hsin Chou; Hsi-Hsien Lin; Shih-Tien Wang; Chien-Lin Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Porous silicon nitride spacers versus PEEK cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical and radiological results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Jasper F C Wolfs; Terry P Corbin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Three- and four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a PEEK cage and plate construct.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Sun-Jung Yoon; Kwang-Bok Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Two-level contiguous cervical disc disease treated with peek cages packed with demineralized bone matrix: results of 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kivanç Topuz; Ahmet Colak; Serdar Kaya; Hakan Simşek; Murat Kutlay; Mehmet Nusret Demircan; Murat Velioğlu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Radiologic Assessment of Subsidence in Stand-Alone Cervical Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cage.

Authors:  Sung-Kon Ha; Jung-Yul Park; Se-Hoon Kim; Dong-Jun Lim; Sang-Dae Kim; Sang-Kook Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2008-12-31

Review 10.  Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications.

Authors:  Ivan Vladislavov Panayotov; Valérie Orti; Frédéric Cuisinier; Jacques Yachouh
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.