Literature DB >> 17321795

The N1 complex to gaps in noise: effects of preceding noise duration and intensity.

Hillel Pratt1, Arnold Starr, Henry J Michalewski, Naomi Bleich, Nomi Mittelman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of duration and intensity of noise that precedes gaps in noise on the N-Complex (N(1a) and N(1b)) of Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to the gaps.
METHODS: ERPs were recorded from 13 normal subjects in response to 20 ms gaps in 2-4.5 s segments of binaural white noise. Within each segment, the gaps appeared after 500, 1500, 2500 or 4000 ms of noise. Noise intensity was either 75, 60 or 45 dBnHL. Analysis included waveform peak measurements and intracranial source current density estimations, as well as statistical assessment of the effects of pre-gap noise duration and intensity on N(1a) and N(1b) and their estimated intracranial source activity.
RESULTS: The N-Complex was detected at about 100 ms under all stimulus conditions. Latencies of N(1a) (at approximately 90 ms) and N(1b) (at approximately 150 ms) were significantly affected by duration of the preceding noise. Both their amplitudes and the latency of N(1b) were affected by the preceding noise intensity. Source current density was most prominent, under all stimulus conditions, in the vicinity of the temporo-parietal junction, with the first peak (N(1a)) lateralized to the left hemisphere and the second peak (N(1b)) - to the right. Additional sources with lower current density were more anterior, with a single peak spanning the duration of the N-Complex.
CONCLUSIONS: The N(1a) and N(1b) of the N-Complex of the ERPs to gaps in noise are affected by both duration and intensity of the pre-gap noise. The minimum noise duration required for the appearance of a double-peaked N-Complex is just under 500 ms, depending on noise intensity. N(1a) and N(1b) of the N-Complex are generated predominantly in opposite temporo-parietal brain areas: N(1a) on the left and N(1b) on the right. SIGNIFICANCE: Duration and intensity interact to define the dual peaked N-Complex, signaling the cessation of an ongoing sound.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17321795     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  12 in total

1.  The auditory P50 component to onset and offset of sound.

Authors:  Hillel Pratt; Arnold Starr; Henry J Michalewski; Naomi Bleich; Nomi Mittelman
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Auditory discrimination: the relationship between psychophysical and electrophysiological measures.

Authors:  Shuman He; John H Grose; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Acoustically evoked auditory change complex in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: a potential objective tool for identifying cochlear implant candidates.

Authors:  Shuman He; John H Grose; Holly F B Teagle; Jennifer Woodard; Lisa R Park; Debora R Hatch; Patricia Roush; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Biological markers of auditory gap detection in young, middle-aged, and older adults.

Authors:  Bernhard Ross; Bruce Schneider; Joel S Snyder; Claude Alain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cortical evoked potentials to an auditory illusion: binaural beats.

Authors:  Hillel Pratt; Arnold Starr; Henry J Michalewski; Andrew Dimitrijevic; Naomi Bleich; Nomi Mittelman
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Processing of voiced and unvoiced acoustic stimuli in musicians.

Authors:  Cyrill Guy Martin Ott; Nicolas Langer; Matthias S Oechslin; Martin Meyer; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-09-06

7.  Neural adaptation to silence in the human auditory cortex: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Hidehiko Okamoto; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.708

8.  Electrical brain imaging evidences left auditory cortex involvement in speech and non-speech discrimination based on temporal features.

Authors:  Tino Zaehle; Lutz Jancke; Martin Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 3.759

9.  Echoic memory: investigation of its temporal resolution by auditory offset cortical responses.

Authors:  Makoto Nishihara; Koji Inui; Tomoyo Morita; Minori Kodaira; Hideki Mochizuki; Naofumi Otsuru; Eishi Motomura; Takahiro Ushida; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Acoustic Change Complex: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Jae-Ryong Kim
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2015-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.