Literature DB >> 17321164

Replicating proximal humeral articular geometry with a third-generation implant: a radiographic study in cadaveric shoulders.

Michael A Wirth1, Jeff Ondrla, Carleton Southworth, Ken Kaar, Brett C Anderson, Charles A Rockwood.   

Abstract

Prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty must replicate humeral geometry or risk compromising success. The purpose of our study was to evaluate humeral head replacement with respect to replicating proximal humeral anatomy. Using scanning technology and AutoCAD, this study was conducted in 2 parts. First, geometric parameters were measured on 35 cadaveric humeri and were used to design a new shoulder arthroplasty system. Second, humeral head replacement was performed on 18 of these humeri by use of the new shoulder arthroplasty system, and selected preoperative and postoperative measurements were compared. Preoperative to postoperative differences were minimal and exhibited improvement compared with earlier designs. In this study, humeral head replacement with a third-generation system reproduced the original anatomy of 18 cadaveric humeri more accurately than previously reported. This finding is important because accurate anatomic reconstruction in shoulders is essential for minimizing subacromial contact and optimizing range of motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17321164     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  10 in total

1.  Variability of medial and posterior offset in patients with fourth-generation stemmed shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ulrich Irlenbusch; Alexander Berth; Georges Blatter; Peter Zenz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Differences in reconstruction of the anatomy with modern adjustable compared to second-generation shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Ulrich Irlenbusch; Steffen End; Mustafa Kilic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Humeral head sizing using extra-articular landmarks on conventional radiographs.

Authors:  David D Savin; Hristo Piponov; Jeffrey Goldstein; Ari R Youderian
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal humeral and glenoid geometry using MicroScribe 3D digitizer.

Authors:  Wejdan H Owaydhah; Mohammad A Alobaidy; Abdulrahman S Alraddadi; Roger W Soames
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Reliability and accuracy of digital templating for the humeral component of total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher S Lee; Shane M Davis; Christianne J Lane; Ryan C Koonce; Andrew P Hartman; Kenneth Ball; James C Esch
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2014-09-07

6.  A 3D-CT scan study of the humeral and glenoid planes in 150 normal shoulders.

Authors:  Lieven De Wilde; Saartje Defoort; Tom R G M Verstraeten; Wendy Speeckaert; Philippe Debeer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Functional outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty in three or four part proximal humerus fracture: A short term followup.

Authors:  Saurabh Agarwal; Ashish Rana; Rajeev K Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 8.  Anatomic humeral head replacement with a press-fit prosthesis: An in vivo radiographic study.

Authors:  Bryan Vopat; Jeremy Truntzer; Daniel Aaron; Jack Anavian; Joel Schwartz; Andrew Green
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2017-10-10

9.  Is global humeral head offset related to intramedullary canal width? A computer tomography morphometric study.

Authors:  Johannes Barth; Jérôme Garret; Achilleas Boutsiadis; Etienne Sautier; Laurent Geais; Hugo Bothorel; Arnaud Godenèche
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2018-09-12

10.  Do the radiological changes seen at mid term follow up of stemless shoulder prosthesis affect outcome?

Authors:  Mohamed Moursy; Milan Niks; Aditya S Kadavkolan; Lars J Lehmann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.