BACKGROUND: Transient postictal imaging abnormalities in patients with non-tumor-related seizures are well documented and include fluid-attenuated inversion recovery/T2 hyperintensity and parenchymal and meningeal contrast enhancement. In contrast, transient postictal imaging abnormalities in patients with tumor-related seizures have been poorly described. Fifty percent of patients with brain tumors have a seizure during the course of their illness and are often imaged after a seizure or after a change in seizure character or frequency. Interval changes on repeat imaging can mimic disease progression or other pathologic processes. METHODS: We describe 3 patients with brain tumors and transient postictal MRI changes that mimicked disease progression and infection. RESULTS: Our patients demonstrated fluid-attenuated inversion recovery/T2 hyperintensity and gadolinium enhancement on MRI studies performed shortly after ictal events. These changes were suspicious for tumor progression in 2 cases and for recurrent infection in the third. Control of seizure activity resulted in resolution of these changes on scans obtained 10 to 21 days later. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging shortly after an ictal event can potentially mislead the clinician to interpret changes as tumor or pathologic progression. Unnecessary intervention in these patients with new and suspicious imaging findings should be avoided. We recommend repeat imaging be performed in patients with brain tumors and seizures several weeks after seizure control if clinically feasible. Further research is needed to delineate the time course of seizure-induced MRI changes.
BACKGROUND: Transient postictal imaging abnormalities in patients with non-tumor-related seizures are well documented and include fluid-attenuated inversion recovery/T2 hyperintensity and parenchymal and meningeal contrast enhancement. In contrast, transient postictal imaging abnormalities in patients with tumor-related seizures have been poorly described. Fifty percent of patients with brain tumors have a seizure during the course of their illness and are often imaged after a seizure or after a change in seizure character or frequency. Interval changes on repeat imaging can mimic disease progression or other pathologic processes. METHODS: We describe 3 patients with brain tumors and transient postictal MRI changes that mimicked disease progression and infection. RESULTS: Our patients demonstrated fluid-attenuated inversion recovery/T2 hyperintensity and gadolinium enhancement on MRI studies performed shortly after ictal events. These changes were suspicious for tumor progression in 2 cases and for recurrent infection in the third. Control of seizure activity resulted in resolution of these changes on scans obtained 10 to 21 days later. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging shortly after an ictal event can potentially mislead the clinician to interpret changes as tumor or pathologic progression. Unnecessary intervention in these patients with new and suspicious imaging findings should be avoided. We recommend repeat imaging be performed in patients with brain tumors and seizures several weeks after seizure control if clinically feasible. Further research is needed to delineate the time course of seizure-induced MRI changes.
Authors: Alexander Radbruch; Kira Lutz; Benedikt Wiestler; Philipp Bäumer; Sabine Heiland; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Maaike J Vos; Johannes Berkhof; Otto S Hoekstra; Ingeborg Bosma; Eefje M Sizoo; Jan J Heimans; Jaap C Reijneveld; Esther Sanchez; Frank J Lagerwaard; Jan Buter; David P Noske; Tjeerd J Postma Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2011-07-14 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Patrick Y Wen; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson; David A Reardon; Howard A Fine; Lauren Abrey; Karla Ballman; Martin Bendszuz; Jan Buckner; Susan M Chang; Michael D Prados; Whitney B Pope; Alma Gregory Sorensen; Martin van den Bent; Wai-Kwan Alfred Yung Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: R-E Yoo; S H Choi; T M Kim; S-H Lee; C-K Park; S-H Park; I H Kim; T J Yun; J-H Kim; C H Sohn Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Fatima Tensaouti; Jonathan Khalifa; Amélie Lusque; Benjamin Plas; Jean Albert Lotterie; Isabelle Berry; Anne Laprie; Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal; Vincent Lubrano Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 2.804