Literature DB >> 17318913

Attitudes to prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality: a comparison of white and Pakistani women in the UK.

Jenny Hewison1, Josephine M Green, Shenaz Ahmed, Howard S Cuckle, Janet Hirst, Clare Hucknall, Jim G Thornton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the attitudes of women from two different ethnic backgrounds to prenatal testing for a range of conditions, and to see if "clusters" of attitudes to different conditions could be identified, for which prenatal testing might be offered as a package.
METHODS: Four hundred and twenty white and Pakistani women living in the UK were surveyed about their attitudes to prenatal testing and termination for 30 different fetal conditions. All participants had recently had a baby.
RESULTS: Pakistani women held more favourable attitudes to prenatal testing, but less favourable attitudes to termination than their white counterparts. Both groups were most in favour of termination for the same four conditions: anencephaly, trisomy 13 or 18, quadriplegia, Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The rank ordering of conditions was also similar. Only 4% of Pakistani and 2% of white women wanted no prenatal testing at all. Fewer than a quarter of participants would consider a termination of pregnancy for 85% of the conditions, but only 25% of Pakistani women and 6% of white women would consider termination for none of the conditions. More advanced statistical analyses were used to measure how closely associated the 30 conditions were in respondents' answers. These analyses identified a principal dimension, reflecting the overall perceived seriousness of the conditions, and a cluster of severely disabling conditions-anencephaly, trisomy 13 or 18, quadriplegia, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and severe learning difficulties-which stood out from the rest. Even within this cluster there remained a considerable amount of individual variation.
CONCLUSION: Women in the study wanted to make up their own minds about the conditions that to them merited testing or termination. These findings have implications for obtaining informed consent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17318913     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  15 in total

1.  Consumers' desire towards current and prospective reproductive genetic testing.

Authors:  Feighanne Hathaway; Esther Burns; Harry Ostrer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Ethnic variations in mortality in pre-school children in Denmark, 1973-2004.

Authors:  Grete Skøtt Pedersen; Laust Hvas Mortensen; Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  A design process for using normative models in shared decision making: a case study in the context of prenatal testing.

Authors:  Sivan Rapaport; Moshe Leshno; Lior Fink
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Genetic testing of children for familial cancers: a comparative legal perspective on consent, communication of information and confidentiality.

Authors:  Roy Gilbar
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  "To perpetuate blindness!": attitudes of UK patients with inherited retinal disease towards genetic testing.

Authors:  Barbara Potrata; Martin McKibbin; Jennifer Nw Lim; Jenny Hewison
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-12-24

6.  Acceptability of prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy in Pakistan.

Authors:  H Jafri; J Hewison; E Sheridan; S Ahmed
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-08-01

7.  Decisions about testing and termination of pregnancy for different fetal conditions: a qualitative study of European White and Pakistani mothers of affected children.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Jenny Hewison; Josephine M Green; Howard S Cuckle; Janet Hirst; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies: population based study.

Authors:  Lucy K Smith; Judith L S Budd; David J Field; Elizabeth S Draper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-07-19

9.  Risk and reproductive decisions: British Pakistani couples' responses to genetic counselling.

Authors:  Alison Shaw
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 10.  Neighborhood Deprivation and Risk of Congenital Heart Defects, Neural Tube Defects and Orofacial Clefts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Séverine Deguen; Wahida Kihal; Maxime Jeanjean; Cindy Padilla; Denis Zmirou-Navier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.