Literature DB >> 17318844

Genetic information: Special or not? Responses from focus groups with members of a health maintenance organization.

Brenda Diergaarde1, Deborah J Bowen, Evette J Ludman, Julie O Culver, Nancy Press, Wylie Burke.   

Abstract

Genetic information is used increasingly in health care. Some experts have argued that genetic information is qualitatively different from other medical information and, therefore, raises unique social issues. This view, called "genetic exceptionalism," has importantly influenced recent policy efforts. Others have argued that genetic information is like other medical information and that treating it differently may actually result in unintended disparities. Little is known about how the general public views genetic information. To identify opinions about implications of genetic and other medical information among the general population, we conducted a series of focus groups in Seattle, WA. Participants were women and men between ages 18 and 74, living within 30 miles of Seattle and members of the Group Health Cooperative. A structured discussion guide was used to ensure coverage of all predetermined topics. Sessions lasted approximately 2 hr; were audio taped and transcribed. The transcripts formed the basis of the current analysis. Key findings included the theme that genetic information was much like other medical information and that all sensitive medical information should be well protected. Personal choice (i.e., the right to choose whether to know health risk information and to control who else knows) was reported to be of crucial importance. Participants had an understanding of the tensions involved in protecting privacy versus sharing medical information to help another person. These data may guide future research and policy concerning the use and protection of medical information, including genetic information. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17318844     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  9 in total

1.  Practical considerations to guide development of access controls and decision support for genetic information in electronic medical records.

Authors:  Diana C Darcy; Eleanor T Lewis; Kelly E Ormond; David J Clark; Jodie A Trafton
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 2.  Genotype-phenotype databases: challenges and solutions for the post-genomic era.

Authors:  Gudmundur A Thorisson; Juha Muilu; Anthony J Brookes
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Denise M Lautenbach; Kurt D Christensen; Jeffrey A Sparks; Robert C Green
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 8.929

Review 4.  Genetics of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and human immunodeficiency virus-associated collapsing glomerulopathy: the role of MYH9 genetic variation.

Authors:  Cheryl A Winkler; George Nelson; Taras K Oleksyk; M Berenice Nava; Jeffrey B Kopp
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.299

5.  Public preferences about secondary uses of electronic health information.

Authors:  David Grande; Nandita Mitra; Anand Shah; Fei Wan; David A Asch
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  How the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) influenced physicians' practice and attitudes.

Authors:  Terry M Bush; Amy E Bonomi; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Evette J Ludman; Susan D Reed; Maureen T Connelly; Lou C Grothaus; Andrea Z LaCroix; Katherine M Newton
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Preferences for Accessing Electronic Health Records for Research Purposes: Views of Parents Who Have a Child With a Known or Suspected Genetic Condition.

Authors:  Melissa Raspa; Ryan S Paquin; Derek S Brown; Sara Andrews; Anne Edwards; Rebecca Moultrie; Laura Wagner; MaryKate Frisch; Lauren Turner-Brown; Anne C Wheeler
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  Implementation of the CDC translational informatics platform--from genetic variants to the national Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register.

Authors:  Imad Abugessaisa; David Gomez-Cabrero; Omri Snir; Staffan Lindblad; Lars Klareskog; Vivianne Malmström; Jesper Tegnér
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 9.  Ethical, legal, and social implications of incorporating genomic information into electronic health records.

Authors:  Ribhi Hazin; Kyle B Brothers; Bradley A Malin; Barbara A Koenig; Saskia C Sanderson; Mark A Rothstein; Marc S Williams; Ellen W Clayton; Iftikhar J Kullo
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 8.822

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.