Literature DB >> 1731852

Prediction of mechanical properties of human atherosclerotic tissue by high-frequency intravascular ultrasound imaging. An in vitro study.

R T Lee1, S G Richardson, H M Loree, A J Grodzinsky, S A Gharib, F J Schoen, N Pandian.   

Abstract

Intravascular ultrasound may be useful for studying the natural history of atherosclerotic lesions of different morphologies and for guiding interventional strategies. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that tissue appearance by intravascular ultrasound is related to the biomechanical properties of atheroma components. Forty-three atheroma caps were obtained from the abdominal aortas of 22 patients at autopsy and studied with an ultrasensitive, servo-controlled spectrometer. By measuring the static strain caused by increasing levels of compressive stress from 30 to 90 mm Hg, the uniaxial unconfined compression stiffness (ratio of stress to strain) was determined. After mechanical testing, specimens were imaged with a 6F, 20-MHz intravascular ultrasound transducer, and images were interpreted by an investigator who was unaware of the mechanical measurements. Specimens were classified as nonfibrous (n = 14), fibrous (n = 18), or calcified (n = 11) based on intravascular ultrasound appearance. The static stiffnesses of the nonfibrous, fibrous, and calcified ultrasound classes were 41.2 +/- 18.8 kPa, 81.7 +/- 33.2 kPa, and 354.5 +/- 245.4 kPa, respectively (p = 0.0002 by analysis of variance). The times to reach static equilibrium (creep time) for the nonfibrous, fibrous, and calcified classes were 79.6 +/- 26.5 minutes, 50.2 +/- 20.0 minutes, and 19.4 +/- 8.1 minutes, respectively (p = 0.0007). Intravascular ultrasound appearance was most significantly related to biomechanical behavior when calcium deposits were noted; the differences in biomechanical behavior between nonfibrous and fibrous tissue appearances were less apparent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1731852     DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.12.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb        ISSN: 1049-8834


  18 in total

1.  Membrane thickness design of implantable bio-MEMS sensors for the in-situ monitoring of blood flow.

Authors:  C A Steeves; Y L Young; Z Liu; A Bapat; K Bhalerao; A B O Soboyejo; W O Soboyejo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Performance of acoustic radiation force impulse ultrasound imaging for carotid plaque characterization with histologic validation.

Authors:  Tomasz J Czernuszewicz; Jonathon W Homeister; Melissa C Caughey; Yue Wang; Hongtu Zhu; Benjamin Y Huang; Ellie R Lee; Carlos A Zamora; Mark A Farber; Joseph J Fulton; Peter F Ford; William A Marston; Raghuveer Vallabhaneni; Timothy C Nichols; Caterina M Gallippi
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Investigating the impact of spatial priors on the performance of model-based IVUS elastography.

Authors:  M S Richards; M M Doyley
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  In vivo volumetric intravascular ultrasound visualization of early/inflammatory arterial atheroma using targeted echogenic immunoliposomes.

Authors:  Hyunggun Kim; Melanie R Moody; Susan T Laing; Patrick H Kee; Shao-Ling Huang; Melvin E Klegerman; David D McPherson
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Studying the effects of matrix stiffness on cellular function using acrylamide-based hydrogels.

Authors:  Alexandra Cretu; Paola Castagnino; Richard Assoian
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 6.  Optical coherence elastography for tissue characterization: a review.

Authors:  Shang Wang; Kirill V Larin
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.207

7.  Adaptive Pulse Wave Imaging: Automated Spatial Vessel Wall Inhomogeneity Detection in Phantoms and in-Vivo.

Authors:  Iason Z Apostolakis; Grigorios M Karageorgos; Pierre Nauleau; Sacha D Nandlall; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Cell-cycle control by physiological matrix elasticity and in vivo tissue stiffening.

Authors:  Eric A Klein; Liqun Yin; Devashish Kothapalli; Paola Castagnino; Fitzroy J Byfield; Tina Xu; Ilya Levental; Elizabeth Hawthorne; Paul A Janmey; Richard K Assoian
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Changing views of the biomechanics of vulnerable plaque rupture: a review.

Authors:  Luis Cardoso; Sheldon Weinbaum
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Matrix stiffness regulates endothelial cell proliferation through septin 9.

Authors:  Yi-Ting Yeh; Sung Sik Hur; Joann Chang; Kuei-Chun Wang; Jeng-Jiann Chiu; Yi-Shuan Li; Shu Chien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.